2017
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMS: Smart Model Selection in PhyML

Abstract: Model selection using likelihood-based criteria (e.g., AIC) is one of the first steps in phylogenetic analysis. One must select both a substitution matrix and a model for rates across sites. A simple method is to test all combinations and select the best one. We describe heuristics to avoid these extensive calculations. Runtime is divided by ∼2 with results remaining nearly the same, and the method performs well compared with ProtTest and jModelTest2. Our software, “Smart Model Selection” (SMS), is implemented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1,101
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,562 publications
(1,165 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1,101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To reconstruct the species tree and calculate the divergence time, single‐copy gene families were extracted and the protein sequences were aligned with MUSCLE. The phylogenetic analysis of the superalignments was performed using a maximum‐likelihood algorithm implemented in the PhyML (Guindon et al., 2010) package with the JTT+G+F model calculated using the Smart Model Selection (Lefort, Longueville, & Gascuel, 2017) (SMS, http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/sms/), and a Bayesian inference method implemented in the MrBayes package (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) with the model used to PhyML. The divergence time was calculated using MCMCtree with the approximate likelihood method (Yang & Rannala, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconstruct the species tree and calculate the divergence time, single‐copy gene families were extracted and the protein sequences were aligned with MUSCLE. The phylogenetic analysis of the superalignments was performed using a maximum‐likelihood algorithm implemented in the PhyML (Guindon et al., 2010) package with the JTT+G+F model calculated using the Smart Model Selection (Lefort, Longueville, & Gascuel, 2017) (SMS, http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/sms/), and a Bayesian inference method implemented in the MrBayes package (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003) with the model used to PhyML. The divergence time was calculated using MCMCtree with the approximate likelihood method (Yang & Rannala, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic relationships for both serotypes were analyzed using a maximum‐likelihood (ML) tree inferred with PhyML,10 under the TN93+G+Г4 model of nucleotide substitution as determined by automatic model selection by SMS: Smart Model Selecion in PhyML11 and the SPR branch‐swapping heuristic tree search algorithm. The reliability of the phylogenies was estimated with the approximate likelihood‐ratio (aLRT) SH‐like test12 and trees were visualized with FigTree v1.4.2 program 13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24, 2018; reconstruction is essential here to not introduce artefactual frameshifts in ancestral iORFs, see below, which depends on the conservation of the same reading frame between the start and the stop codon. Historian was run with a Jukes-Cantor model and using a phylogenetic tree inferred from aligned intergenic sequences by PhyML version 3.0 (Guindon et al 2010) with the Smart Model Selection (Lefort et al 2017) and YPS128 as outgroup.…”
Section: Ancestral Reconstructions Of Intergenic Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%