2012
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2182775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMOS Radio Frequency Interference Scenario: Status and Actions Taken to Improve the RFI Environment in the 1400–1427-MHz Passive Band

Abstract: ESA's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission is perturbed with Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI) that jeopardize part of its scientific retrievals in some areas in the World, especially over continental areas in Europe, south Asia and the Middle East. Areas affected by RFIs might led to data loss or to underestimation of soil moisture and salinity retrievals, The SMOS team has put in place a few strategies that, one year after launch, have already improved the RFI situation in Europe where half of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
124
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
124
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4.1 that the radiative transfer modelling works reliably under most conditions in the study area, this points towards an RFI issue because it affects both L1c and L2 data. The mean positive bias in the SMOS brightness temperatures (compare Table 2) adds to this argumentation (Oliva et al, 2012) state that RFI can produce higher SMOS brightness temperatures which would lead to a dry bias in the soil moisture retrievals. The mean positive bias in the SMOS brightness temperatures can partly explain the observed dry bias in the SMOS L2 soil moisture products, that were found by dall'Amico (2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Modelled Brightness Temperatures For the Yeamentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4.1 that the radiative transfer modelling works reliably under most conditions in the study area, this points towards an RFI issue because it affects both L1c and L2 data. The mean positive bias in the SMOS brightness temperatures (compare Table 2) adds to this argumentation (Oliva et al, 2012) state that RFI can produce higher SMOS brightness temperatures which would lead to a dry bias in the soil moisture retrievals. The mean positive bias in the SMOS brightness temperatures can partly explain the observed dry bias in the SMOS L2 soil moisture products, that were found by dall'Amico (2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Modelled Brightness Temperatures For the Yeamentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For comparisons between modelled soil moisture and SMOS soil moisture, the mean correlation coefficient in the Vils test site for 2011 is 0.54, the mean bias 0.13 m 3 m 3 . In Europe the performance of the SMOS L2 soil moisture product was considerably affected by radio frequency interference (RFI) since the launch of SMOS (Albergel et al, 2012;Balling et al, 2011), but the amount of contaminated data has exhibited a decrease due to RFI mitigation efforts and switching off of RFI sources (Oliva et al, 2012). In 2010, several RFI sources were obvious in SMOS L1c data in Germany that have disappeared in 2011.…”
Section: F Schlenz Et Al: Analysis Of Smos Brightness Temperature Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second component of the retrieval algorithm is an iterative optimisation scheme that minimises a Bayesian cost function constructed from the observed and the modelled TBs in order to retrieve the physical parameter values. Preprocessing and post-processing steps are implemented to filter the input and output data for undesired effects like the decrease in quality due to spatial sampling or radio frequency interferences (RFIs) (Oliva et al, 2012;Richaume et al, 2014).…”
Section: Algorithm Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Ascending and descending orbits are processed separately since the impact of RFI (Oliva et al, 2012) and sun corrections (Khazâal et al, 2016) between ascending and descending orbits are very different.…”
Section: Orbit Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RFI extends over large areas of the world, mainly in Europe, Middle East and Asia, due to the different frequency allocations [33]. Since RFI is highly variable in time and polarization, average values of previous information cannot be reliably used.…”
Section: Radio Frequency Interference Detection and Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%