2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMOS based high resolution soil moisture estimates for desert locust preventive management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is in accordance, although slightly lower, with the SM range proposed by Ref. 89, which is between 0.10 and 0.20 m 3 ∕m 3 . Hopper mortality is closely linked to food shortage, 4 which in arid environments is closely linked with inadequate precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This value is in accordance, although slightly lower, with the SM range proposed by Ref. 89, which is between 0.10 and 0.20 m 3 ∕m 3 . Hopper mortality is closely linked to food shortage, 4 which in arid environments is closely linked with inadequate precipitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The DisPATCh algorithm has been implemented and validated in several climatic regions such as Catalonia, Spain (Merlin et al, 2013), Central Morocco (Merlin et al, 2015), South-Eastern Australia (Malbéteau, Merlin, Molero, Rüdiger, & Bacon, 2016) and two watersheds in the USA . Escorihuela et al (2018) have shown that field measures of soil moisture in desert areas of Algeria, Mali, Mauritania and Morocco correlates well with SMELLS estimates of soil moisture using the DisPATCh algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…SMOS data supplements the CWB's information on soil moisture, which allows the indication of soil moisture conditions suitable for plant growth, and threats of droughts and floods. Comparisons of SMOS data against in-situ SM measurements showed good values of correlation (R > 0.7) [25,26] and relatively low RMSE (i.e., 0.04 m 3 m −3 ) [7,22,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%