2018
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00615
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothness Metrics in Complex Movement Tasks

Abstract: Smoothness is a main characteristic of goal-directed human movements. The suitability of approaches quantifying movement smoothness is dependent on the analyzed signal's structure. Recently, activities of daily living (ADL) received strong interest in research on aging and neurorehabilitation. Such tasks have complex signal structures and kinematic parameters need to be adapted. In the present study we examined four different approaches to quantify movement smoothness in ADL. We tested the appropriateness of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each phase of the TUG test, the linear accelerations and angular velocities were summed to yield the SPARC linear total and SPARC angular total, respectively (Beck et al, 2018). As previously described (Beck et al, 2018;Gulde and Hermsdörfer, 2018), SPARC metrics follow the assumption that less smooth movements are more complex in terms of their frequency composition. Therefore, less movement smoothness indicates lower SPARC values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each phase of the TUG test, the linear accelerations and angular velocities were summed to yield the SPARC linear total and SPARC angular total, respectively (Beck et al, 2018). As previously described (Beck et al, 2018;Gulde and Hermsdörfer, 2018), SPARC metrics follow the assumption that less smooth movements are more complex in terms of their frequency composition. Therefore, less movement smoothness indicates lower SPARC values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aligned with this technology, we opted to use state-of-the-art movement smoothness metrics to quantify movement quality, the spectral arc length (SPARC) (Balasubramanian et al, 2012(Balasubramanian et al, , 2015Beck et al, 2018). SPARC has essential advantages in evaluating movement smoothness if compared to other metrics, such as the number of velocity peaks (Gulde and Hermsdörfer, 2018) or jerk (Hogan and Sternad, 2009;Balasubramanian et al, 2012). In a previous study, we used an IMU system to evaluate and quantify mobility smoothness of persons with PD and freezing of gait (FOG) during a functional mobility test (Pinto et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to meaningfully compare values of movement smoothness across different tasks, but within a consistent task, a smoothness metric can be calculated to quantify performance. Many methods have been proposed for how to quantify movement smoothness [25].…”
Section: Improvements In Movement Smoothnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Maximum Extension Torque: the maximum torque value recorded during a static hold phase at the maximum extension angle (10); • Zero Torque Angle: the angular value corresponding to null torque exerted by the robot; in this configuration, flexor and extensor torques (free of gravity force contributions) are equal and opposite and the system is ideally not applying any force to hold the elbow in position (10); • Joint Impedance: measure of the total limb resistance to muscle elongation, computed as the ratio between the difference in joint torque over the corresponding change in joint angular position (33,34); for constant, slow-speed movements, the main contribution to the joint impedance can be identified in the joint stiffness (i.e., rigidity For the active exercises, the main outcome measure is the movement smoothness: recently, several studies (35,36) have approached the question of how to classify and quantify movement "smoothness." Unequivocally, healthy subjects show faster, more continuous movements compared to patients affected by neural deficits (37).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%