2012
DOI: 10.1214/11-aoas514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothing proximal gradient method for general structured sparse regression

Abstract: We study the problem of learning high dimensional regression models regularized by a structured-sparsity-inducing penalty that encodes prior structural information on either input or output sides. We consider two widely adopted types of such penalties as our motivating examples: 1) overlapping group lasso penalty, based on the 1 / 2 mixed-norm penalty, and 2) graph-guided fusion penalty. For both types of penalties, due to their non-separability, developing an efficient optimization method has remained a chall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
285
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 217 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
285
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To further demonstrate the advantages of FEGA-MTL, we compare it with the other graph-guided MTL methods [6,26]. Fig.4 shows that higher accuracy is obtained with our approach for different training set sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To further demonstrate the advantages of FEGA-MTL, we compare it with the other graph-guided MTL methods [6,26]. Fig.4 shows that higher accuracy is obtained with our approach for different training set sizes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fig.4 shows that higher accuracy is obtained with our approach for different training set sizes. A main difference between FEGA-MTL and these methods [6,26] is that they do not decompose w t,c as s t,c + θ t,c , and due to the non-consideration of task-specific components θ t,c , they have less flexibility. Moreover, in [26] (due to the use of 2 norm) and [6] (due to smoothing) task-clustering is encouraged but not enforced, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations