2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoothed Biasing Forces Yield Unbiased Free Energies with the Extended-System Adaptive Biasing Force Method

Abstract: We report a theoretical description and numerical tests of the extended-system adaptive biasing force method (eABF), together with an unbiased estimator of the free energy surface from eABF dynamics. Whereas the original ABF approach uses its running estimate of the free energy gradient as the adaptive biasing force, eABF is built on the idea that the exact free energy gradient is not necessary for efficient exploration, and that it is still possible to recover the exact free energy separately with an appropri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
203
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
203
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where Z A ∈ (0, ∞) thanks to (38), is the unique invariant distribution of the biased SPDE (39), see for instance [16]. (12) in the case where the diffusion process is governed by a SPDE:…”
Section: The Spde Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where Z A ∈ (0, ∞) thanks to (38), is the unique invariant distribution of the biased SPDE (39), see for instance [16]. (12) in the case where the diffusion process is governed by a SPDE:…”
Section: The Spde Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observations made in Section 1.1, concerning the system (2) and the consistency result, Theorem 1.1, can be generalized as follows.First, contrary to (1), the state space of the dynamics may not be compact. It may also be of infinite dimension.The most important generalization concerns the type of diffusion processes which are considered: our general framework also encompasses the following examples (this list is not exhaustive): (hypoelliptic) Langevin dynamics with position and momenta variables, extended dynamics -where an auxiliary variable is associated with the mapping ξ, see [38]) -and Stochastic Partial Differential Equations (SPDEs) -which are infinite dimensional diffusion processes. It may also be possible to study diffusions on smooth manifolds, however to simplify the presentation this situation is not treated.Abstract notation and analysis allow us to treat simulataneously these examples in a general framework.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of its popularity and versatility, the expanded ensemble method has been the subject of numerous studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] over recent years. To evaluate the thermodynamic expectations, several estimators have been proposed, namely, the (standard) binning estimator, 6 a standard reweighting estimator 21 , a self-consistent reweighting estimator 17 called simulated tempering weighted histogram analysis method (STWHAM), a histogram reweighting estimator 22 called corrected z-averaged restraints (CZAR) and an adiabatic reweighting (AR) estimator. 20,21 Self-consistent reweighting estimators are known under various names such as the Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR) method 23 , the wheighted histogram analysis method 24,25 (WHAM), the reverse logistic regression 26 , bridge sampling, 27 the multi-state BAR method 28 , binless WHAM 29 and the global likelihood method.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore consider that the adaptive sampling process has been successfully completed: the biasing potential is frozen and does not depend on the simulation time anymore. We then show how to condition the binning, 6 standard reweighting, 21 self-consistent reweighting 17 and histogram reweighting 22 estimators of thermodynamic expectations, and demonstrate that the conditioning procedure systematically leads to the formulation of the adiabatic reweighting estimator. By comparing the asymptotic variances of the involved estimators, we eventually deduce that the conditioning procedure ensures systematic variance reduction, entailing that the adiabatic reweighting estimator is optimal among the large class of considered estimators.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%