Smooth switching LPV controller design for LPV systems

Hanifzadegan, Masih; Nagamune, Ryozo

doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.03.014

Cited by 58 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Switching among multiple controllers in the scheduling control techniques may produce non-smooth transient responses for manipulating signals which could lead to mechanical damage, fatigue loading, or signal saturations. Therefore it is undesirable in practical applications where the bumpless transferring is an important issue [17,18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smooth switching in a scheduled robust model predictive controller

Khani

Haeri

2015

Journal of Process Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smooth switching in a scheduled robust model predictive controller

Khani

Haeri

2015

Journal of Process Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…separated by switching surfaces, and one local LPV controller is designed for each subset. Switching among local controllers is generally implemented according to parameter-dependent switching rules such as hysteresis switching, average-dwell-time (ADT) switching and smooth switching (Hanifzadegan & Nagamune, 2014). State-dependent switching without online measurement of varying parameters is considered in Deaecto, Geromel, and Daafouz (2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Switching LPV controller design under uncertain scheduling parameters

Zhao

Nagamune

2017

Automatica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…While, for a class of time-varying systems with input quantization and saturation, both Refs. [15,16] are not mentioned and need for further research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ref. [15] presents a method to design a smooth switching gain-scheduled linear parameter varying (LPV) controller for LPV systems, such that it has a smooth transition of controllers. Ref.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smooth Switching Tracking Control for a Class of Linear Time-Varying Systems with Input Quantization and Input Saturation

Zhu-bing¹,

Cai²,

Du³

2016

Open Autom. Control Syst. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper deals with the problem of robust smooth switching state feedback controller design for a class of linear timevarying systems with input quantization and input saturation, which is a common case in the practical engineering for modern flight vehicle. First, the problem statement is presented, in which a tracking problem is converted into a regulation problem by constructing a deviation system, the tracking error deviation is treated as the system performance and the conditions for smooth switching tracking control are discussed based on the theory of robust control technique. Secondly, the state feedback gain of the deviation system with input saturation and input quantization is designed by solving Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs) based convex optimization problem with the conditions for smooth switching tracking control being considered. Finally, validation simulations are carried out for the longitudinal dynamics model of hypersonic vehicle driven by Reaction Control System (RCS) to illustrate the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed approach.

show abstract

Smooth switching LPV controller design for LPV systems

Cited by 58 publications

References 23 publications

Smooth switching in a scheduled robust model predictive controller

Smooth switching in a scheduled robust model predictive controller

Switching LPV controller design under uncertain scheduling parameters

Smooth Switching Tracking Control for a Class of Linear Time-Varying Systems with Input Quantization and Input Saturation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About