2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2011.00755.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth Plug‐in Inverse Estimators in the Current Status Continuous Mark Model

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We consider the problem of estimating the joint distribution function of the event time and a continuous mark variable when the event time is subject to interval censoring case 1 and the continuous mark variable is only observed in case the event occurred before the time of inspection. The nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator in this model is known to be inconsistent. We study two alternative smooth estimators, based on the explicit (inverse) expression of the distribution function of interest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the second coordinate we took 5 cells for the MSLE, which means that the bias on the second coordinate does not play a role, since 0.6 is then a point of the grid for the second coordinate, and on the first coordinate we took the number of cells between 4 (for n = 500) and 7 (for n = 10 000). The results were obtained by generating 10 000 samples for each value of (t, z), considered in the table, and each sample size n. We compared the results with the MSE's of the plug-in estimator F (1) n , studied in Groeneboom et al (2011), and defined by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the second coordinate we took 5 cells for the MSLE, which means that the bias on the second coordinate does not play a role, since 0.6 is then a point of the grid for the second coordinate, and on the first coordinate we took the number of cells between 4 (for n = 500) and 7 (for n = 10 000). The results were obtained by generating 10 000 samples for each value of (t, z), considered in the table, and each sample size n. We compared the results with the MSE's of the plug-in estimator F (1) n , studied in Groeneboom et al (2011), and defined by…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of δ n of order n −1/5 is probably optimal. One can also choose ε n of this order, but it is probably better to choose ε n δ n , see for a discussion on this matter Groeneboom et al (2011). Further remarks on the problem of binwidth choice can be found in section 4.…”
Section: Model Description and Definition Of The Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with the results in . Groeneboom, Jongbloed & Witte (2011) and Groeneboom, Jongbloed & Witte (2012) consider the exact setting of this paper using frequentist estimation methods. In Groeneboom, Jongbloed & Witte (2011) two plug-in inverse estimators are proposed.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%