2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-3227(99)00118-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth or oscillating late Holocene sea-level curve? Evidence from the palaeo-zoology of fixed biological indicators in east Australia and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
42
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While generally stable from c.6,500 years ago, there was another sea level rise (between 1-2m in height) sometime between 4-3,000 BP (Baker and Haworth 2000). It has been argued that the marine coastal ecology probably did not stabilise until c.4,000 BP, meaning that shellfish and Chapter 2: the Sydney Basin-environmental context estuarine resources probably did not become important to coastal/estuarine inhabitants until this time (Callaghan 1980, White andO'Connell 1982).…”
Section: Climatic and Eustatic Changementioning
confidence: 96%
“…While generally stable from c.6,500 years ago, there was another sea level rise (between 1-2m in height) sometime between 4-3,000 BP (Baker and Haworth 2000). It has been argued that the marine coastal ecology probably did not stabilise until c.4,000 BP, meaning that shellfish and Chapter 2: the Sydney Basin-environmental context estuarine resources probably did not become important to coastal/estuarine inhabitants until this time (Callaghan 1980, White andO'Connell 1982).…”
Section: Climatic and Eustatic Changementioning
confidence: 96%
“…While it is generally accepted that relative sea level reached a maximum of 1-1.5 m above present mean sea level (pmsl) by ~7 ka (Lewis et al, 2013), interpretations of relative sea-level fall after the mid-Holocene highstand have varied and include: 1) a smoothly falling sea level to present (Chappell, 1983); 2) a highstand that remained until ~2 ka (Sloss et al, 2007) or 1.2 ka (Lewis et al, 2015) and then abruptly fell to present levels; and 3) an oscillating sea level, with meter scale fluctuations (Baker and Haworth, 2000, Lewis et al, 2008, Leonard et al, 2015. As reef growth is highly sensitive to variations in sea level (Woodroffe and Webster, 2014), a fall or possible oscillation in sea level should be reflected in the growth response of mid-outer platform…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it was postulated that a final rise in sea level occurred during this interval, before finally falling to present levels. However, this remains an issue of contention with multi-proxy data (e.g., microatolls, tubeworm-barnacles, reef flat cores) showing divergent sea-level trends within this region (Harris et al, 2015, Baker and Haworth, 2000.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This region is characterized by a mid-Holocene highstand. Both smooth and oscillating sea-level trends have been recorded since the highstand [179,180]. This discrepancy in part reflects differences in the sea-level indicators used and their interpretation [178 ].…”
Section: Oceaniamentioning
confidence: 99%