1980
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620151110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smooth interpolation of large sets of scattered data

Abstract: Methods for solving the following data‐fitting problems are discussed: given the data (xi, yi, fi),i = 1,…,N construct a smooth bivariate function S with the property that S(xi, yi) = fii = 1,…,N. Because the desire to fit this type of data is encountered frequently in many areas of scientific applications, an investigation of the available methods for solving this problem was undertaken. Several aspects, such as computational efficiency, fitting characteristics and ease of implementation, were analysed and co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
197
0
4

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
197
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Modified Shepard's Method can be either an exact or a smoothing interpolator. Franke and Nielson (1980) developed a modification that eliminates the insufficiency of the Shepard's method, and does not tend to generate "bull's eye" patterns.…”
Section: Modified Shepard's Methods (Ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Modified Shepard's Method can be either an exact or a smoothing interpolator. Franke and Nielson (1980) developed a modification that eliminates the insufficiency of the Shepard's method, and does not tend to generate "bull's eye" patterns.…”
Section: Modified Shepard's Methods (Ms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partition of unity (PU) [1], [4] is a mathematical tool very useful to combine local approximation in order to define a global one. Important properties such as the global maximal error and the convergence order could be inherited from the local approximation.…”
Section: Partition Of Unitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular versions of the latter process have previously been applied in such programs as the SURFACE II package of the Kansas Geological Survey. After the preparation of this paper, the recent work of Franke and Nielson [3] came to our attention. In [3] too, the projector P is derived as an alternative to G, and some practical guidance to actual computation is given.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%