1987
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1987.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking, passive smoking and histological types in lung cancer in Hong Kong Chinese women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
46
3
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
46
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The above results in the study of female lung cancer and smoking status were quite similar to the reports in China and abroad (2,3,4). Smoking increase the risk of female lung cancer in Shenyang districts up to 2.5 times but the increase is still lower than that for males.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above results in the study of female lung cancer and smoking status were quite similar to the reports in China and abroad (2,3,4). Smoking increase the risk of female lung cancer in Shenyang districts up to 2.5 times but the increase is still lower than that for males.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The results are quite different from that reported by Lam and Kung et al (3,5). Adenocarcinoma in our study was relatively less frequent but small cells carcinoma was more .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies based on general exposure to ETS produced similar results (6,7). Similarly, a large number of case-control studies conducted in several countries provided evidence of an increased risk for lung cancer associated with ETS exposure from the spouse, indicating an exposure-response relationship (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The evidence for an association between lung cancer and childhood exposure to ETS is less consistent than that for exposure in adulthood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Besides active smoking, environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has been linked to excess risk of lung cancer in epidemiologic studies (11)(12)(13). However, the overall evidence indicates that this association is weak (in terms of relative risk) and varied widely according to the study design and the population under study (14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%