1982
DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1982.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking-induced changes in nicotine disposition: Application of a new HPLC assay for nicotine and its metabolites

Abstract: A sensitive, rapid high-pressure liquid chromatographic assay was developed to compare the disposition of an intravenous dose of 14C-nicotine in normal, carefully matched smokers and nonsmokers. The elimination half-lifes of nicotine and cotinine were shorter in smokers than in nonsmokers. Also consistent with an inductive effect of smoking was the increased nicotine elimination rate constant in smokers, but smoking induced more complex kinetic changes: nicotine volume of distribution was diminished in smokers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
34
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17 In our study, the tW2 in never-smokers exposed to ETS under strictly controlled conditions was significantly longer than that seen for smokers. In most cases, the peak cotinine levels for smokers were much higher than in the ETSexposed subjects, but no relation existed between peak cotinine levels and the tV2A for cotinine excretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…17 In our study, the tW2 in never-smokers exposed to ETS under strictly controlled conditions was significantly longer than that seen for smokers. In most cases, the peak cotinine levels for smokers were much higher than in the ETSexposed subjects, but no relation existed between peak cotinine levels and the tV2A for cotinine excretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This question was not considered in two further recent kinetic studies based on intravenous administration of nicotine. Moreover, the terminal plasma half-life of nicotine was somewhat different in these studies, averaging 0.8 h in one (Kyerematen et al, 1982) (Benowitz et al, 1982), but in the former case calculations were based on a less precise onecompartment model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetics of nicotine as well as cotinine have been extensively studied in serum of smokers during the past few years (Benowitz et al, 1982;Isaac & Rand, 1972;Kyerematen et al, 1982Kyerematen et al, , 1983Langone & van Vunakis, 1975;Russell & Feyerabend, 1978). To gain detailed information on nicotine and cotinine concentrations in milk of nursing smokers we have investi-9 gated both the extent of transfer of nicotine and cotinine from serum into milk and have compared the half-lives of nicotine and cotinine in milk with corresponding half-lives in serum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%