the ALSPAC Study Team]There is remarkably wide variation in rates of infancy growth, however, its regulation is not well understood. We examined the relationship between maternal smoking, parity, and breast-or bottlefeeding to size at birth and childhood growth between 0 and 5 y in a large representative birth cohort. A total of 1335 normal infants had weight, length/height, and head circumference measured at birth and on up to 10 occasions to 5 y old. Multilevel modeling (MLwiN) was used to analyze longitudinal growth data. Infants of maternal smokers were symmetrically small at birth (p Ͻ 0.0005) compared with infants of nonsmokers, however, showed complete catch-up growth over the first 12 mo. In contrast, infants of primiparous pregnancies were thin at birth (p Ͻ 0.0005), showed dramatic catch-up growth, and were heavier and taller than infants of nonprimiparous pregnancies from 12 mo onwards. Breast-fed infants were similar in size at birth than bottle-fed infants, but grew more slowly during infancy. Among infants who showed catch-up growth, males caught up more rapidly than females (p ϭ 0.002). In conclusion, early postnatal growth rates are strongly influenced by a drive to compensate for antenatal restraint or enhancement of fetal growth by maternal-uterine factors. The mechanisms that signal catch-up or catch-down growth are unknown but may involve programming of appetite. The importance of nutrition on early childhood growth is emphasized by the marked difference in growth rates between breast-and bottle-fed infants. The sequence of fetal growth restraint and postnatal catch-up growth may predispose to obesity risk in this contemporary population. Size at birth and rate of growth in infancy are important indicators of infant mortality and morbidity; smaller size being a major risk factor for mortality, particularly due to infectious disease (1, 2). More recently, early growth patterns have also been linked to adulthood metabolic and cardiovascular diseases that are exacerbated by excessive weight gain and obesity (3). Both small and large size at birth have been related to increased disease risk (4, 5), whereas childhood obesity and adult disease risk may be further programmed by rapid, or "catch-up," infancy growth (6 -8), however, the mechanisms surrounding these links remain elusive (9).There is remarkably wide variation in rates of infancy growth (10). Its regulation is not well understood, though it is likely to involve appetite and nutrition, which may be influenced by determinants of fetal growth, as well as being influenced by choice of postnatal feeding practice (11). The effects of maternal smoking and parity on size at birth are well described (12, 13), however, their influence on postnatal growth is less clear (14 -16).We therefore examined the relationship of these factors, and also of early breast-or bottle-feeding, to size at birth and childhood growth between 0 and 5 y in a large representative birth cohort, the ALSPAC Children in Focus cohort.
METHODS
Subjects.Recruitment of the ALSPA...