2009
DOI: 10.1375/jsc.4.supp.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking During Pregnancy and Smoking Cessation Services

Abstract: BackgroundObtaining accurate figures on the extent of smoking during pregnancy is a challenge in many countries, and the United Kingdom is no exception. Prevalence figures in the United Kingdom are drawn from the infant feeding survey, which is conducted infrequently (every 5 years) and relies on self-report data collected from women following delivery (Information Centre, 2007). The survey asks two main questions about smokingwhether women have smoked in the 12 months before or during pregnancy, and whether t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent Cochrane Review found financial incentive schemes to be the single most effective intervention for smoking cessation in pregnancy, with an estimated quit rate of 24% for those offered incentives compared with 6% for those receiving other interventions [ 5 ]. The promising use of financial incentives for promoting smoking cessation and improving birth outcomes has also been confirmed by a recent analytical review focusing specifically on this intervention [ 6 ], as well as by a meta-analysis of the three most robust trials in the Cochrane review [ 7 ]. These trials, however [ 8 10 ], included only 350 women in total and used only 7-day point prevalence of smoking abstinence as a primary outcome, leading authors to recommend replication in more robust designs, using larger samples and standardized assessments of continuous abstinence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A recent Cochrane Review found financial incentive schemes to be the single most effective intervention for smoking cessation in pregnancy, with an estimated quit rate of 24% for those offered incentives compared with 6% for those receiving other interventions [ 5 ]. The promising use of financial incentives for promoting smoking cessation and improving birth outcomes has also been confirmed by a recent analytical review focusing specifically on this intervention [ 6 ], as well as by a meta-analysis of the three most robust trials in the Cochrane review [ 7 ]. These trials, however [ 8 10 ], included only 350 women in total and used only 7-day point prevalence of smoking abstinence as a primary outcome, leading authors to recommend replication in more robust designs, using larger samples and standardized assessments of continuous abstinence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The majority of adults, including pregnant women, are aware that smoking in pregnancy compromises the health of the baby (HEA , Arnold et al . ) and a wide range of information and support is available to pregnant women to help them quit (Bauld ). However, the majority of pregnant smokers do not quit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently updated systematic review [9] found the most effective of these to involve the use of financial incentives for stopping smoking (financial incentives vs. other interventions: OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.82). Findings were based on results from four trials conducted in the USA [10-13] and were confirmed by a further meta-analysis of three of these [14]. The mechanisms by which financial incentives operate to influence behaviour, including smoking cessation during pregnancy, are, however, poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%