2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking cessation interventions in the Oxford region: changes in dentists' attitudes and reported practices 1996–2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Purposive sampling of principal dentists ensured a full range of perspectives was included in the study. Time since qualification [9][10][11] and the NHS/private mix of a practice 10,11 both influence perspectives of involvement in general health promotion in quantitative studies. Other factors such as dentists' sex and practice size were also assumed to be influential variables.…”
Section: Qualitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Purposive sampling of principal dentists ensured a full range of perspectives was included in the study. Time since qualification [9][10][11] and the NHS/private mix of a practice 10,11 both influence perspectives of involvement in general health promotion in quantitative studies. Other factors such as dentists' sex and practice size were also assumed to be influential variables.…”
Section: Qualitative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early 9,10 and more recent studies 11 found that the percentage of dentists involved in smoking cessation was considerably lower than those who felt they had a role to play in such activity. However, involvement is increasing.…”
Section: N B R I E Fmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both cost studies were excluded as they were not conducted in the UK. From the 14 studies, only eight of them were eventually included; [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] the other six were excluded as they did not focus on dentists in the UK or did not evaluate smoking cessation activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%