2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking before the birth of a first child is not associated with increased risk of breast cancer: findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Cohort Study and a meta-analysis

Abstract: It has been suggested that the period between puberty and first birth is a time when the breast is particularly susceptible to carcinogenic effects. In a cohort of 3047 women aged 60 -79 years (N ¼ 139 breast cancer cases), we found no association between smoking before the birth of a first child and breast cancer risk: fully adjusted (for age, number of children, age at birth of first child, age at menarche, age at menopausal, hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy, ever use of oral contraception, use of hormone re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A metaanalysis based on 11 studies published before or in early 2004 concluded that smoking prior to a first birth is not associated with increased risk of breast cancer [26]. However, this meta-analysis did not include three recent cohort studies, all of which observed positive associations [15,18,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A metaanalysis based on 11 studies published before or in early 2004 concluded that smoking prior to a first birth is not associated with increased risk of breast cancer [26]. However, this meta-analysis did not include three recent cohort studies, all of which observed positive associations [15,18,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among them, three of the case-controls studies [16,17,23] and all cohort studies [18,24,25] observed an increase in breast cancer risk with long-term cigarette smoking. In addition, two population-based case-control studies [16,17] and five cohort studies [15,18,[24][25][26] have assessed the association between smoking before a first full-term pregnancy and breast cancer risk. Among them, all of the case-control studies [16,17] and four of the cohort studies [15,18,24,25] associated smoking before a first full-term pregnancy with increased risk of breast cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many published reports on the effects of smoking on breast cancer risk in the general population [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In 2002, Terry and Rohan [23] reviewed the published studies and concluded that smoking probably did not increase the risk of breast cancer, although there may be an increased risk for women with a long duration of exposure and in those who smoked prior to a first full-term pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corroborating these lines of reasoning, Band et al (2002) reported an increased risk with smoking initiated prior to first birth and among nulliparous women. However, a recent meta-analysis showed a null association between smoking prior to the birth of a first child and risk of breast cancer (Lawlor et al, 2004).…”
Section: Smoking and Breast Cancer Risk C Magnusson Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of smoking in breast cancer aetiology has been extensively studied (Band et al, 2002; Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, 2002;Terry and Rohan, 2002;Lawlor et al, 2004). Yet, the association remains equivocal and much debated (Terry and Rohan, 2002;Johnson, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%