2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and Radiolucent Periapical Lesions in Root Filled Teeth: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between smoking habits and the prevalence of radiolucent periapical lesions (RPLs) in root-filled teeth (RFT). Methods: The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) question was: in adult patients who have RFT, does the absence or presence of a smoking habit affect the prevalence of RPLs associated with RFT? Systematic MEDLINE/PubMed, Wiley Online Database, Web of Science, Scopus, and PRISMA protocol were used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two systematic reviews with meta‐analysis have analysed the association of smoking habits with the prevalence of RPL in RFT (Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Jiménez‐Sánchez, et al, 2020) and with the occurrence of RFT extraction (Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Bermudo‐Fuenmayor, et al, 2020). These systematic reviews concluded that low evidence indicates that RFT of smoking patients are three times more likely to be extracted (OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.2–10.1; p = .02; Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Bermudo‐Fuenmayor, et al, 2020), and moderate quality scientific evidence indicates a weak but significant relationship between smoking and the prevalence of RPLs in RFT (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1–1.3; p < .001; Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Jiménez‐Sánchez, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two systematic reviews with meta‐analysis have analysed the association of smoking habits with the prevalence of RPL in RFT (Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Jiménez‐Sánchez, et al, 2020) and with the occurrence of RFT extraction (Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Bermudo‐Fuenmayor, et al, 2020). These systematic reviews concluded that low evidence indicates that RFT of smoking patients are three times more likely to be extracted (OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.2–10.1; p = .02; Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Bermudo‐Fuenmayor, et al, 2020), and moderate quality scientific evidence indicates a weak but significant relationship between smoking and the prevalence of RPLs in RFT (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1–1.3; p < .001; Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Jiménez‐Sánchez, et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, these systemic conditions can decrease the success rate of RCT and provoke incomplete wound healing (typically granulomatous tissue formation) in the periapical region (Sasaki et al, 2016). This is not just a possibility, the results of several studies have shown worse success rate of RCT, with higher percentage of post‐operative radiolucent periapical lesions (RPL) and higher proportion of nonretained root filled teeth (RFT), in patients with systemic diseases (Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Bermudo‐Fuenmayor, et al, 2020; Cabanillas‐Balsera, Segura‐Egea, Jiménez‐Sánchez, et al, 2020; Nagendrababu et al, 2020; Ng et al, 2011; Segura‐Egea et al, 2015, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two retrospective studies have found that RCT in smokers had fewer successes and more failures than in non-smoker patients [140,143]. Furthermore, two recent systematic reviews with meta-analysis have found significant association between smoking and higher frequency of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth [144], and higher frequency of extraction of root-filled teeth [145].…”
Section: Confirmedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between smoking and AP is controversial in the literature. Whilst some authors showed a positive association between smoking and periapical lesions visualized on radiographs (Aleksejuniene et al, 2000; Cabanillas‐Balsera et al, 2020a; Kirkevang & Wenzel, 2003; Krall et al, 2006; Segura‐Egea et al, 2008, 2011). Other studies demonstrated no significant effect (Bergström et al, 2000; Frisk & Hakeberg, 2006; Rodriguez et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%