1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02180043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and performance — a puff-by-puff analysis

Abstract: A new version of the Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) task has been developed in this laboratory to examine the effects of each puff from a cigarette upon continuous performance. Two cigarettes were tested and compared with a not-smoking and a sham-smoking control. The results show improvements resulting from just two puffs both in terms of correct detections and reaction times. Both measures of performance were maintained at a higher level during and after smoking, compared with not-smoking and sham… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicated delay in the transmission and processing of impulse at cortical level. Similar results have been observed by Revell et al, [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This indicated delay in the transmission and processing of impulse at cortical level. Similar results have been observed by Revell et al, [22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The absorption of nicotine via this method of delivery is rather rapid (see Figure 1). Although, as the figure illustrates, the concentration of nicotine in blood declines rather quickly, there is no evidence that performance correlates with plasma nicotine levels in control subjects (Revell, 1988). This dose of nicotine produces maximal enhancement of P50 inhibition (Adler et al, 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It requires sustained attention but also has a moderate working memory load. Nicotine has been found to decrease reaction times and improve correct detections on this task (Foulds 1996, Warburton and Mancuso 1998, Baldinger et al 1995, Revell 1988. These findings are unlikely to reflect the reversal of a withdrawal-induced deficit in performance in nicotine-dependant smokers as they have also been observed in non-abstinent smokers (Warburton and Arnall 1994) and non-smokers (Wesnes & Revell, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%