2014
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.16.20776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and older age associated with mumps in an outbreak in a group of highly-vaccinated individuals attending a youth club party, the Netherlands, 2012

Abstract: We describe a mumps outbreak in a highly-vaccinated population attending a party at a youth club. In a retrospective cohort study with 60 of approximately 100 participants responding, vaccination status was verified for 58/59 respondents, of whom 54 were vaccinated twice and four once. The attack rate was 22% (13 cases, all vaccinated), with smoking at the party (risk ratio (RR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-6.0, p=0.001) and age ≥21 years (RR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.1-10.2, p<0.0001) as risk factors for disea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is higher than the 2% symptomatic mumps AR found in a large serological study, especially when considering the much longer follow-up period of the latter study (average 26 months) [5]. The AR we found is, however, much lower than the ARs of 13% and 22% found in outbreaks of mumps affecting adolescent populations with a similar vaccination coverage [9, 12]. The median age of participants to our study (23 years) matched the age of cases of mumps during the epidemic, with the majority being 18–25 years [3].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is higher than the 2% symptomatic mumps AR found in a large serological study, especially when considering the much longer follow-up period of the latter study (average 26 months) [5]. The AR we found is, however, much lower than the ARs of 13% and 22% found in outbreaks of mumps affecting adolescent populations with a similar vaccination coverage [9, 12]. The median age of participants to our study (23 years) matched the age of cases of mumps during the epidemic, with the majority being 18–25 years [3].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This is therefore not an explanation for the difference in ARs. The key characteristic of the outbreaks with a high AR was that they occurred among attendees of a party [9, 12]. This suggests particular circumstances favouring transmission occurred during these parties that were not present in our networks around a mumps case, even though a relatively large proportion of our participants did attended social gatherings and parties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their recent article, Ladbury et al present an investigation of an outbreak of mumps in a highly vaccinated group attending a youth club party in March 2012 [1]. The article suggested that crowded social events and smoking may facilitate spread of mumps virus among a highly vaccinated population and that waning immunity may also play a role.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To apply and assess the tools that we develop, we use mumps notification and sequence data reported between 2009 and mid-2016 in the Netherlands. We specifically chose mumps in the Netherlands as it has been intensively studied over the past few years, with comprehensive documentation available [28][29][30][31][32][33]. In the Netherlands, mumps is a notifiable disease and symptomatic cases are reported to the MHS by physicians and/or laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%