2016
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and Mental Illness: A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Output Over Time

Abstract: Introduction: The prevalence of smoking among persons with a mental illness has remained unchanged, being 2-3 times higher than the general population in high-income countries. Assessment of the volume and characteristics of research output over time can assist in identifying research priorities to promote progress within a field. The aim of this study was to undertake such an assessment in the field of smoking and mental illness. Methods: A descriptive repeat cross-sectional study was conducted of peer-review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review is timely because smoking among individuals with mental illness has gained attention, and research in this area has grown exponentially. A recent bibliometric analysis of the literature on tobacco and mental illness documented a steady increase in research outputs from the two-year periods of 1993–1995 ( n = 65) to 2003–2005 ( n = 153) to 2013–2015 ( n = 329) ( 81 ). Notably, the study designs remained predominantly descriptive in form (>80%), with few experimental studies testing cessation interventions (<13%).…”
Section: Overview and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review is timely because smoking among individuals with mental illness has gained attention, and research in this area has grown exponentially. A recent bibliometric analysis of the literature on tobacco and mental illness documented a steady increase in research outputs from the two-year periods of 1993–1995 ( n = 65) to 2003–2005 ( n = 153) to 2013–2015 ( n = 329) ( 81 ). Notably, the study designs remained predominantly descriptive in form (>80%), with few experimental studies testing cessation interventions (<13%).…”
Section: Overview and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, many high-quality randomised trials of smoking interventions exclude persons with a mental health disorder15 16 and those focused on this population group often lack rigour due to, for example, small sample size and low participant retention 17–19. More rigorous intervention research is needed to address this international public health issue 20 21…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high income countries [2, 3] including Australia [4, 5], the prevalence of smoking remains disproportionately high among some population groups such as those with a diagnosed mental illness [68], where the prevalence has been estimated between 36 and 67% [911]. More rigorous intervention research tailored to smokers with a mental illness has been recommended to address the associated inequitable health burden [12, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%