2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and local unemployment: Evidence from Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Azagba et al reported that having a job and the related stress had a positive and statistically significant impact on smoking intensity (30). In contrast, a study in Germany showed that unemployment was a reason for high prevalence of smoking (31). Overall, it seems that having a job, particularly a high-stress job and unemployment increase the odds of cigarette smoking through increased psychological stress (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azagba et al reported that having a job and the related stress had a positive and statistically significant impact on smoking intensity (30). In contrast, a study in Germany showed that unemployment was a reason for high prevalence of smoking (31). Overall, it seems that having a job, particularly a high-stress job and unemployment increase the odds of cigarette smoking through increased psychological stress (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the procyclical sign of this relationship reverses when the analysis focuses on the prevalence of smoking. Several studies corroborate that the susceptibility to smoking increases during a recession and quantify the trend (Wang et al 2016;Kaiser et al 2018;Schunck and Rogge 2009). Concretely, Wang et al (2016) estimate the rise in the likelihood of smoking to be approximately 1.45% for each one-percentage-point rise in the unemployment rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The potential benefits of such interventions are likely to be very high given the substantial costs that nicotine transmission to children may generate. This issue is likely to be even more important in recession times, being the probability of become a smoker much higher during these periods (Kaiser et al, 2018). Only considering the immediate health damage to children, Frijters et al (2011) calculate that the income equivalence of exposure to passive smoking is £16,000 per year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%