1996
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.18.1302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and Colorectal Cancer: a 20-Year Follow-up Study of Swedish Construction Workers

Abstract: Our large cohort study did not indicate any excess risk of colon cancer in males who were long-term heavy smokers and provided only weak support for an association with rectal cancer. Our data are thus consistent with the majority of previous reports. The reasons for the discrepancies in comparison with recent U.S. data have yet to be identified.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
55
2
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
55
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological mechanism behind this subsite specificity is unknown, but differences in the embryonic tissues of the colon and rectum and in patterns of growth factors and receptors may be relevant (Chyou et al, 1996;Bonithon-Kopp and Benhamiche 1999;Wei et al, 2004). Also, nicotine may have a differential effect on colon and rectum: enhancing motility in the colon (thus reducing transit time of other carcinogens in the colon), but not in the rectum (Nyren et al, 1996); tobacco carcinogens may be more concentrated in the rectum than in the colon (Terry et al, 2002;Wei et al, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological mechanism behind this subsite specificity is unknown, but differences in the embryonic tissues of the colon and rectum and in patterns of growth factors and receptors may be relevant (Chyou et al, 1996;Bonithon-Kopp and Benhamiche 1999;Wei et al, 2004). Also, nicotine may have a differential effect on colon and rectum: enhancing motility in the colon (thus reducing transit time of other carcinogens in the colon), but not in the rectum (Nyren et al, 1996); tobacco carcinogens may be more concentrated in the rectum than in the colon (Terry et al, 2002;Wei et al, 2004). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we could not evaluate smoking as a potential confounder or as an effect modifier. Data have been mixed on whether smoking is an independent risk factor for colorectal cancer, 26,27 and if anything a higher risk is restricted to those who have smoked for several decades. Thus, it is unlikely that smoking is an important confounder of the association between acrylamide and colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid misunderstandings or inconsistencies, the answers were double-checked by a nurse at the time of the visit. The quality of the smoking data has been reviewed previously (Nyrén et al 1996). Briefly, in that study missing data on duration of smoking was noted in 1.3% of current smokers and 1.4% of previous smokers.…”
Section: Assessment Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%