2019
DOI: 10.20452/pamw.14931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoking and cardiovascular diseases – is there more paradox than expected?

Abstract: risk factors in primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of CVD. Smoking cessation in tertiary prevention is the most important single lifestyle intervention and its effect is stronger than lipid profile modification. 6 The devastating effect of tobacco smoke is related to a mixture of more than 7000 chemicals contributing to endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, dyslipidemia, vascular and hemodynamic function, and a prothrombotic state. Cigarette smoking influences all phases of atherosclerosis from endot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interpretation was that smokers with acute stroke were younger than non-smokers and had lower rates of complications, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Similarly, in the era of endovascular treatment for cardiovascular diseases, the paradoxical effect of smoking was demonstrated in landmark clinical trials, where the short-term prognosis for smokers with acute cardiovascular diseases after mechanical thrombectomy was better than that for non-smokers (adjusted OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.76) (31,32). Furthermore, previous studies of a subgroup analysis of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) demonstrated a reduced incidence of 30day postoperative major adverse events in smokers compared with non-smokers (adjusted OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.85) (33).…”
Section: Smoking Is Inversely Associated With the Risk Of New Cerebral Infarctions After Endovascular Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another interpretation was that smokers with acute stroke were younger than non-smokers and had lower rates of complications, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Similarly, in the era of endovascular treatment for cardiovascular diseases, the paradoxical effect of smoking was demonstrated in landmark clinical trials, where the short-term prognosis for smokers with acute cardiovascular diseases after mechanical thrombectomy was better than that for non-smokers (adjusted OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.76) (31,32). Furthermore, previous studies of a subgroup analysis of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) demonstrated a reduced incidence of 30day postoperative major adverse events in smokers compared with non-smokers (adjusted OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.85) (33).…”
Section: Smoking Is Inversely Associated With the Risk Of New Cerebral Infarctions After Endovascular Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, the study data were limited due to the retrospective nature of the study. It was difficult to subdivide the smoking state of the patients into currently smoking and previously smoking without more details of smoking, however, it has been found that the devastating effects of tobacco smoking on vessels are lasting and do not subside easily after quitting (31). Several studies have reported better short-term outcomes in smokers, including previously and currently smoking compared with non-smokers (42).…”
Section: Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, age was not associated with radiation discontinuation and there was no significant interaction between age and smoking status in the multivariable models. Therefore, the observed paradoxical association between smoking and radiation discontinuation is likely explained by the combination of difference in age in conjunction with a potential 'smoker's paradox' [15][16][17] in this population but this requires further investigation. Alongside validating the identified variables in our analysis, additional markers should be sought to help accurately guide who will likely finish CRT and should therefore undergo definitive treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At long -term follow -up, abMI was an independent factor that decreased the mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.3-0.75; P = 0.001) (TAblES 4 and 5). note is the smoker's paradox, which has been described in numerous papers [15][16][17][18][19] and associated with inconsistent results of analysis. In the GUSTO -I (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) trial, smokers admitted to the hospital with ACS and treated with thrombolytics had a significantly lower rate of in -hospital and 30-day mortality than nonsmokers.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Blood Flow and Time Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the GUSTO -I (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries) trial, smokers admitted to the hospital with ACS and treated with thrombolytics had a significantly lower rate of in -hospital and 30-day mortality than nonsmokers. 18 Ramotowski et al 19 summarized the influence of smoking on cardiovascular disease development and the smoker's paradox. They hypothesized that hemostasis in smokers is modified, including changes in endothelial function, platetet activation, and fibrinolysis.…”
Section: Coronary Artery Blood Flow and Time Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%