2006
DOI: 10.1024/1421-0185.65.1.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smokers’ (Dis)satisfaction, Persuasive Constraint, and Influence of Expert and Non-Expert Sources

Abstract: The present research tested the hypothesis that an internal motivation to change is elaborated as an external constraint and is less predictive of change when the source is expert than when it is non-expert. In two studies, smokers were categorized as either dissatisfied or moderately satisfied according to their degree of dissatisfaction with their image as smokers (i.e., internal motivation to change). They were then exposed to an antismoking argument attributed either to an expert or to a non-expert source.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our findings suggest that merely enforcing the antismoking norm in order to increase antismoking attitudes and reduce smoking behavior overlooks the complex personal and social contexts in which behavioral decisions are made. In fact, our results support the view that smoking and smoking cessation are related to complex identity processes involving self-esteem maintenance (e.g., Dijkstra & Buunk, 2008;Falomir & Mugny, 2004;Falomir, Mugny & Invernizzi, 2006;Lloyd & Lucas, 1998). Indeed, past research has shown that identity processes are among the most important determinants of smoking onset (e.g., Aloise-Young, Hennigan, & Graham, 1996;Barton, Chassin, Presson, & Sherman, 1982;Burton, Sussman, Hansen, Johnson, & Flay, 1989;Falomir et al, 2007;Shadel, Tharp-Taylor, & Fryer, 2008), intention to quit (Falomir & Invernizzi, 1999), reactions to antismoking messages (Falomir & Mugny, 2004;Freeman, Hennessy, & Marzullo, 2001), and smoking cessation (Gibbons, Eggleston, & Benthin, 1997;Shadel, Mermelstein, & Borrelli, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, our findings suggest that merely enforcing the antismoking norm in order to increase antismoking attitudes and reduce smoking behavior overlooks the complex personal and social contexts in which behavioral decisions are made. In fact, our results support the view that smoking and smoking cessation are related to complex identity processes involving self-esteem maintenance (e.g., Dijkstra & Buunk, 2008;Falomir & Mugny, 2004;Falomir, Mugny & Invernizzi, 2006;Lloyd & Lucas, 1998). Indeed, past research has shown that identity processes are among the most important determinants of smoking onset (e.g., Aloise-Young, Hennigan, & Graham, 1996;Barton, Chassin, Presson, & Sherman, 1982;Burton, Sussman, Hansen, Johnson, & Flay, 1989;Falomir et al, 2007;Shadel, Tharp-Taylor, & Fryer, 2008), intention to quit (Falomir & Invernizzi, 1999), reactions to antismoking messages (Falomir & Mugny, 2004;Freeman, Hennessy, & Marzullo, 2001), and smoking cessation (Gibbons, Eggleston, & Benthin, 1997;Shadel, Mermelstein, & Borrelli, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%