2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smoke control in case of fire in a large car park: CFD simulations of full-scale configurations

Abstract: HRR fire, which is the order of magnitude for a car fire, the required ventilation velocity to limit smoke back-layering in a flat ceiling car park is around 1.1 m/s. When beams are present, the average velocity must be higher, particularly for longitudinal beams. If smoke is trapped inside a recirculation region, increasing the smoke extraction rate does not help to remove the smoke.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the fire source happens to be located in such a recirculation or stagnation zone, the smoke and heat are not effectively removed. Even worse, in such circumstances, an increase in extraction rate does not always help to remove the smoke [9,10]. This confirms that a single value, be it a velocity or an extraction flow rate, is not sufficient to quantify the performance of an SHC system under such conditions.…”
Section: B a Car Park Is Not A Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If the fire source happens to be located in such a recirculation or stagnation zone, the smoke and heat are not effectively removed. Even worse, in such circumstances, an increase in extraction rate does not always help to remove the smoke [9,10]. This confirms that a single value, be it a velocity or an extraction flow rate, is not sufficient to quantify the performance of an SHC system under such conditions.…”
Section: B a Car Park Is Not A Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such large differences in existing standards served as motivation for the present research. In [9,10], it is argued that the values in [17,19] are more appropriate numbers, in the context of fire fighters approaching the fire source along a smoke-free access path up to a distance of 15m or less. The reader is referred to those papers for more detail.…”
Section: Smoke and Heat Control By Horizontal Mechanical Ventilation mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations