2018
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMMB: a stochastic Markov blanket framework strategy for epistasis detection in GWAS

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Symmetrical uncertainty (SU ): Mutual information has been widely adopted for data mining from high-dimensional data. However, it tends to favor features with more values while ignoring interactive features [ 31 ]. In this study, SU was utilized to compensate for the bias of mutual information toward features with more values, as previously described [ 27 , 30 ], and this was defined as Equation (7): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Symmetrical uncertainty (SU ): Mutual information has been widely adopted for data mining from high-dimensional data. However, it tends to favor features with more values while ignoring interactive features [ 31 ]. In this study, SU was utilized to compensate for the bias of mutual information toward features with more values, as previously described [ 27 , 30 ], and this was defined as Equation (7): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…True positives (TPs) are defined as the discovery of a k-way SNP combination that is associated with disease status, and FNs (false negatives) are defined as a non-discovery of a SNP combination that is associated with disease. TNs (true negatives) indicate no discovery, and FPs (false positives) are defined as a k-way SNP combination that is falsely associated with a disease status [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the expressions of ∈ (1, ∞). Recent studies that include simulations based on epistasis models to generate their evaluation data [20][21][22] settle on low-order models whose heritability values are worryingly moderate. However, real-world diseases are usually determined by a higher number of genes [1] and a higher heritability [23,24].…”
Section: Model Restrictions and Existing Epistasis Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods focus only on qualitative traits and tend to lead to complex models. Machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine, ant colony algorithm, and random forest attempt to make nonparametric models to detect epistasis ( Chen et al 2008 ; Li et al 2016 ; Yuan et al 2017 ; Niel et al 2018 ). Machine learning approaches are useful in detecting higher-order epistatic relationships thanks to their low computational costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%