2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03966-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smile attractiveness in class III patients after orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, previous studies have usually included patients with maxilla retrognathism and mandible prognathism. 8,12,34,35 Consequently, our analysis had fewer confounding factors, and we obtained consistent skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with orthognathic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, previous studies have usually included patients with maxilla retrognathism and mandible prognathism. 8,12,34,35 Consequently, our analysis had fewer confounding factors, and we obtained consistent skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes with orthognathic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this retrospective study, we quantitatively evaluated the relationship of smile parameters with the surgical outcomes of patients with skeletal Class malocclusion by cephalometric factors, including landmarks and displacements. Although many studies have examined soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery among patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion [28][29][30][31] , to the best of our knowledge, few studies have evaluated changes in smile parameters after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion [12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results agree with prior research findings where people with normal occlusion were perceived as more attractive compared with those with malocclusion. 20,21 Self-perceived aesthetics was also found to be associated with malocclusion severity levels among Brazilian adolescents. 22 The existence of cultural and individual variations in acceptance of some occlusal irregularities, such as diastemas, 23,24 suggests a need for comparison of results from different populations to identify cultural differences in the impact of occlusal irregularities on perceived smile attractiveness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Patients with severe malocclusion have poor oral aesthetic self-perception, with aesthetic impact expressed by the constraint on smiling or showing teeth 24 . Malocclusion adversely affects the attractiveness of the face and smile, especially in the case of Class III malocclusion 5 7 , 25 . Thus, it is known that self-evaluation of facial attractiveness such as smile is closely related to facial morphology and malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%