2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0021900200003922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smile Asymptotics II: Models with Known Moment Generating Functions

Abstract: The tail of risk neutral returns can be related explicitly with the wing behaviour of the Black-Scholes implied volatility smile. In situations where precise tail asymptotics are unknown but a moment generating function is available we establish, under easy-to-check Tauberian conditions, tail asymptotics on logarithmic scales. Such asymptotics are enough to make the tail-wing formula (see Benaim and Friz (2008)) work and so we obtain, under generic conditions, a limiting slope when plotting the square of the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although people have known for a long time that, numerically, two‐sided jumps can produce flexible volatility smiles for call and put options on stocks, a complete theoretical justification of this is still needed. For example, only recently Benaim and Friz (2006a, 2006b) gave a rigorous proof of the asymptotic shape of the implied volatility curves, as the strike price K goes to infinity or to zero under various models, including jump models. On the other hand, Renault and Touzi (1996) and Sircar and Papanicolaou (1999) proved that under a stochastic volatility model, if K is within the neighborhood of the initial stock price S 0 , then the implied volatility curves should be convex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although people have known for a long time that, numerically, two‐sided jumps can produce flexible volatility smiles for call and put options on stocks, a complete theoretical justification of this is still needed. For example, only recently Benaim and Friz (2006a, 2006b) gave a rigorous proof of the asymptotic shape of the implied volatility curves, as the strike price K goes to infinity or to zero under various models, including jump models. On the other hand, Renault and Touzi (1996) and Sircar and Papanicolaou (1999) proved that under a stochastic volatility model, if K is within the neighborhood of the initial stock price S 0 , then the implied volatility curves should be convex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the tail behaviour of a M i x e d T S ( μ , β , α , λ + , λ − )−Γ( a , b ) that denotes a MixedTS distribution with Gamma mixing r.v., we need first to recall the structure of its moment generating function where without loss of generality, we require μ =0. If Y ∼ M i x e d T S (0, β , α , λ + , λ − )−Γ( a , b ), the moment generating function is defined as MY(u)=E()euY=[]bb()βu+normalΦH(u)a. We recall some useful results on the study of asymptotic tail behaviour given in Benaim and Friz (). Given the moment generating function M of a r.v.…”
Section: Univariate Mixed Tempered Stablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…X with cumulative distribution function F ( x ) defined as M(u):=euxdF(x) we consider r ⋆ and q ⋆ defined respectively as q:=inf{}u:M(u)<, and r:=sup{}u:M(u)<, where r ⋆ , q ⋆ ∈(0, ∞ ). Criterion I in Benaim nd Friz () for asymptotic study of tails states…”
Section: Univariate Mixed Tempered Stablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations