2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2007.916091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMES Optimization Benchmark Extended: Introducing Pareto Optimal Solutions Into TEAM22

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 compares reliabilities calculated for optimal designs in Table 3, where the corresponding current densities are taken as uncertain ones with σ=[0.179,0.179] T MA/m 2 . The optimal design [15], however, is definitely better than [16] because the former gives a better objective value and a higher reliability at the same time. Between the optimal designs [17] and [18], neither of them can be said a superior design because of the confliction between the objective value and the reliability level.…”
Section: B Uncertainty Is Considered In Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 6 compares reliabilities calculated for optimal designs in Table 3, where the corresponding current densities are taken as uncertain ones with σ=[0.179,0.179] T MA/m 2 . The optimal design [15], however, is definitely better than [16] because the former gives a better objective value and a higher reliability at the same time. Between the optimal designs [17] and [18], neither of them can be said a superior design because of the confliction between the objective value and the reliability level.…”
Section: B Uncertainty Is Considered In Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…8, should be as small as possible. In order to achieve these targets, the geometric parameters of inside and outside coils, and current densities (J 1 , J 2 ) should be optimized [15]. The objective function to be minimized is defined as follows: where B stray,i is the magnetic flux density on the ith sampling point and the reference stray field is B norm =3 mT.…”
Section: Team Problem 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 5 shows the configuration of one SMES system, which has been accepted as one benchmark optimization problem for testing of electromagnetic analysis method; it is composed of two concentric coils carrying current with opposite directions [10]. The optimal design of the SMES should couple the totally stored energy of E 0 =180 (MJ) with a minimal stray field.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Application To the Superconductor Magnetic Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the three-parameter (radius, height, and thickness of outer coil) SMES optimization problem [10], the three geometric parameters…”
Section: A Reliability Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%