2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02242-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smell, taste and trigeminal disorders in a 65‐year‐old population

Abstract: Background Smell, taste and trigeminal disorders likely have a substantial impact on human daily life. However, data regarding the prevalence of these disorders in Norway are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of smell, taste, trigeminal disorders and associated factors in a 65-year-old population in Oslo, Norway. Methods A random sample of 223 individuals (123 men, 100 women) participated in the study. Medical history … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, olfactory dysfunction is a relatively common feature in older individuals, probably related to multiple factors, such as nasal engorgement, cumulative damage to the olfactory epithelium, and sensory loss of receptor cells to odorants, among others. [21][22][23][24] Although we could only observe a slight tendency of lower scores for older individuals, it is important to note that our sample was significantly older compared with that of the reference study. 7 This factor explains the low proportion of normosmia found in the present study, even in the healthy CG, highlighting the need for larger studies to establish cutoff scores on the mCCCRC to classify normosmia or hyposmia based on age in Brazil.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Indeed, olfactory dysfunction is a relatively common feature in older individuals, probably related to multiple factors, such as nasal engorgement, cumulative damage to the olfactory epithelium, and sensory loss of receptor cells to odorants, among others. [21][22][23][24] Although we could only observe a slight tendency of lower scores for older individuals, it is important to note that our sample was significantly older compared with that of the reference study. 7 This factor explains the low proportion of normosmia found in the present study, even in the healthy CG, highlighting the need for larger studies to establish cutoff scores on the mCCCRC to classify normosmia or hyposmia based on age in Brazil.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The demographic characteristics of our study confirm previous observations of a higher rate of olfactory disorders and Long-COVID-19 in women [ 15 ]. Smell alterations are attributed to neuroinflammation of the olfactory bulb [ 16 ] and women, perhaps more predisposed to (neuro)inflammation, already have a higher baseline rate of olfactory bulbs atrophy with aging compared with men in the same age range [ 17 ]. We speculate that SARS-CoV-2 infection may ulterior increase this risk [ 18 ] because of neuroinflammation; similarly the infection might act on other neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases [ 19 ], including Alzheimer Disease (AD) and Parkinson Disease [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking, a modifiable risk, was associated with an increased probability of self-reported fair/poor vision, taste, and smell (but not hearing, consistent with Kiely et al, 2012 ). Altered function within these senses among older adult smokers versus nonsmokers has been previously documented ( Doty, 2018 ; Klein et al, 2008 ; Murphy et al, 2002 ; Nolan et al, 2012 ; Sødal et al, 2021 ). For example, current smoker status has been associated with lower macular optical pigment density, which is detrimental to healthy visual function, in the TILDA cohort ( Nolan et al, 2012 ; see also Klein et al, 2008 ), as well as poorer olfactory identification abilities ( Murphy et al, 2002 ) and more frequent experiences of unpleasant oral sensations ( Sødal et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Altered function within these senses among older adult smokers versus nonsmokers has been previously documented ( Doty, 2018 ; Klein et al, 2008 ; Murphy et al, 2002 ; Nolan et al, 2012 ; Sødal et al, 2021 ). For example, current smoker status has been associated with lower macular optical pigment density, which is detrimental to healthy visual function, in the TILDA cohort ( Nolan et al, 2012 ; see also Klein et al, 2008 ), as well as poorer olfactory identification abilities ( Murphy et al, 2002 ) and more frequent experiences of unpleasant oral sensations ( Sødal et al, 2021 ). Importantly, only current smokers showed increased odds of reporting fair/poor ability across these modalities (see also Murphy et al, 2002 and Nolan et al, 2012 for compatible findings).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%