2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-7037(00)00378-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smectite dissolution kinetics at 80°C and pH 8.8

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results show that the experimental data can be fitted by an empirical nonlinear rate law within the framework of transition state theory as shown in Nagy and Lasaga (1992). The chlorite dissolution rate varied as a function of the Gibbs free energy over a larger range (-ΔG r >100 kJ/mol) than expected from a linear TST rate law, and was similar to the dissolution rate formulation determined for smectite (-ΔG r >130 kJ/mol) (Cama et al, 2000). Our results indicate that chlorite dissolution is inhibited under a wide range of saturation conditions and might explain the fact that a low reactivity of Cranfield rock was measured by Lu et al (2012) in batch experiments even though a high reactive surface area was determined by Landrot et al (2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results show that the experimental data can be fitted by an empirical nonlinear rate law within the framework of transition state theory as shown in Nagy and Lasaga (1992). The chlorite dissolution rate varied as a function of the Gibbs free energy over a larger range (-ΔG r >100 kJ/mol) than expected from a linear TST rate law, and was similar to the dissolution rate formulation determined for smectite (-ΔG r >130 kJ/mol) (Cama et al, 2000). Our results indicate that chlorite dissolution is inhibited under a wide range of saturation conditions and might explain the fact that a low reactivity of Cranfield rock was measured by Lu et al (2012) in batch experiments even though a high reactive surface area was determined by Landrot et al (2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…(Burch et al, 1993;Cama et al, 2000;Carroll et al, 1998;Hellmann and Tisserand, 2006; Nagy et al, 1999;Nagy and Lasaga, 1992). Nagy and Lasaga (1992) propsed to use the following equation to describe gibbsite dissolution rate as a function of ΔGr: where m and n are experimentally determined coefficients.…”
Section: Effect Of Environmental Variables On Mineral Dissolution Kinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the experiments dealing with the dissolution of montmorillonite in an alkaline medium, some have endeavored to determine the kinetic laws; , Cama et al (2000), Huertas et al (2001), Huertas et al (2004), Yamagushi et al (2004), Madé and Michaux (2005) and Tsutsui et al (2005). Temperature and pH are two factors that accelerate the dissolution of montmorillonite.…”
Section: Dissolution Kinetics Of Montmorillonite In An Alkaline Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also their beidellite smectite (Ibecco) has lower dissolution rates than Wyoming montmorillonite. Cama et al (2000) shows how difficult it is to obtain kinetic constants. For a single pH of 8.8 at 80 °C, their values (log molSi/m 2 /s) range between -11 and -14 ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Dissolution Kinetics Of Montmorillonite In An Alkaline Mediummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation