2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone Icon User Interface design for non-literate trackers and its implications for an inclusive citizen science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We first performed the examination of the related work with a particular emphasis on publications stemming from the selected initiatives, i.e. (Altenbuchner, 2018; E. H. Blake, 2002;Chiaravalloti, 2017aChiaravalloti, , 2017bChiaravalloti, Homewood, & Erikson, 2017;Liebenberg et al, 2017;Stevens et al, 2013Stevens et al, , 2014Vitos, 2018a;Vitos et al, 2017Vitos et al, , 2013. From our goals and the related work examination the two authors individually extracted themes that were later refined in an internal discussion, as well as in a discussion that followed the workshop where the initial outline of our work was presented Workshop at UCL, London (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first performed the examination of the related work with a particular emphasis on publications stemming from the selected initiatives, i.e. (Altenbuchner, 2018; E. H. Blake, 2002;Chiaravalloti, 2017aChiaravalloti, , 2017bChiaravalloti, Homewood, & Erikson, 2017;Liebenberg et al, 2017;Stevens et al, 2013Stevens et al, , 2014Vitos, 2018a;Vitos et al, 2017Vitos et al, , 2013. From our goals and the related work examination the two authors individually extracted themes that were later refined in an internal discussion, as well as in a discussion that followed the workshop where the initial outline of our work was presented Workshop at UCL, London (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that our analysis remains limited to mobile computing technologies (with mainly pictorial interfaces, which target non-literate and low-literate users) as it was the method of choice for data collection in all the studies we examined. The most common tool we encountered was Sapelli (Stevens et al, 2013), followed by Cybertracker (Liebenberg et al, 2017) and Open Data Kit (Hartung et al, 2010) (see Table 1). However, other tools, either alone or in combination with mobile apps, such as paper surveys, maps, special sensing equipment and others, may be used in extreme citizen science projects.…”
Section: Designing Mobile-based Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen science emerged and gained popularity in the Western academe as a result of a rapid expansion of information and communication technologies (ICTs) . Scientists in various disciplines, in particular, ecology and conservation scholars, discovered the potential to cut the costs of research and bring their projects to scale: by mobilizing volunteers to collect environmental observations (bird counting, taking water samples) and sending them via their ICT devices to an online database, they were able to obtain panel data of unprecedented scope and scale (Liebenberg et al, 2017;Cieslik et al, 2018). This became known as participatory environmental monitoring: engaging the citizens in collecting observations that help scientists build better models.…”
Section: Participatory Science Participatory Environmental Monitorinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Icon-based apps have predominated in places where foreign scientists had to cope with language barriers or a lack of literacy on the part of their field assistants. Examples of successful deployment of icon-based apps include indigenous groups monitoring fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon (Oviedo and Bursztyn 2017) and residents of Congo discovering and reporting an outbreak of Ebola virus in wildlife before it spread to humans (Liebenberg et al 2017). CyberTracker (https://www.cybertracker.org), an open-source project, allows researchers to build Android apps customized for particular environments and research goals.…”
Section: Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%