2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smartphone-based remote monitoring of vision in macular disease enables early detection of worsening pathology and need for intravitreal therapy

Abstract: Background/aimsTo assess the outcomes of home monitoring of distortion caused by macular diseases using a smartphone-based application (app), and to examine them with hospital-based assessments of visual acuity (VA), optical coherence tomography-derived central macular thickness (CMT) and the requirement of intravitreal injection therapy.DesignObservational study with retrospective analysis of data.MethodsParticipants were trained in the correct use of the app (Alleye, Oculocare, Zurich, Switzerland) in person… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Home vision monitoring with portable devices and smartphone-based apps has shown potential for common medical retinal disease. 13,18,19 The Notal Vision Foresee Home was shown to pick up more patients converting from dry AMD to nAMD than office visits. 20 Shape discrimination hyperacuitybased apps have also been used to detect fellow-eye conversion to nAMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Home vision monitoring with portable devices and smartphone-based apps has shown potential for common medical retinal disease. 13,18,19 The Notal Vision Foresee Home was shown to pick up more patients converting from dry AMD to nAMD than office visits. 20 Shape discrimination hyperacuitybased apps have also been used to detect fellow-eye conversion to nAMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Digital technologies, such as home vision monitoring devices and smartphone-based apps, have recently enabled reliable monitoring of visual function for patients with common retinal disease, allowing earlier disease detection and treatment. [10][11][12][13] In contrast to passive monitoring, solutions that encourage active patient engagement may lead to improved health outcomes. 14,15 It is reasonable to infer that an app that increases patient engagement through reminders may lead to improved compliance and clinical outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…92 Home OCTs and smart phone apps measuring vision, contrast sensitivity, ocular alignment, subretinal fluid, and metamorphopsia may be used for at-home monitoring and earlier detection of disease. [93][94][95] Fundus photographs, slit lamp photography, laser flare photometry, fluorescein angiography, OCTs, and OCTAs can be obtained with minimally trained staff, be remotely operated, or be self-operated. 93,96 Artificial intelligence (AI) or a remote screener can help evaluate the images.…”
Section: Teleophthalmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, applications using this system do not seem to have a PPV that is better than that found for Odysight ® in the present study; for instance, it is higher than that reported by Teo et al, who found an indication of intravitreal injection in only 5/33 alerts in a study evaluating the Alleye ® application [ 21 ]. Other studies do report higher PPV, but the 60% PPV found by Islam et al for the indication of reinjection was greatly overestimated because only those who had both an alert on the Alleye ® application and who had experienced a visual loss during the first UK lockdown due to COVID-19 were seen in consultation (i.e., only 28 patients of the total of 78 patients with an analyzable alert) [ 22 ]. In addition, the 80% PPV reported by Faes et al for the indication of reinjection following an alert triggered by Alleye ® is also overestimated, as the follow-up appointment was not brought forward in case of an alert, alerts with extreme variations in score were not considered, and only patients performing the test once or more times a week were included [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%