Smartphone-Based Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behavior and Promote Physical Activity Using Integrated Dynamic Models: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background Traditional psychological theories are inadequate to fully leverage the potential of smartphones and improve the effectiveness of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) change interventions. Future interventions need to consider dynamic models taken from other disciplines, such as engineering (eg, control systems). The extent to which such dynamic models have been incorporated in the development of interventions for PA and SB remains unclear. Objective This review aims to quantify the number of studies that have used dynamic models to develop smartphone-based interventions to promote PA and reduce SB, describe their features, and evaluate their effectiveness where possible. Methods Databases including PubMed, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 15, 2019, using terms related to mobile health, dynamic models, SB, and PA. The included studies involved the following: PA or SB interventions involving human adults; either developed or evaluated integrated psychological theory with dynamic theories; used smartphones for the intervention delivery; the interventions were adaptive or just-in-time adaptive; included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pilot RCTs, quasi-experimental, and pre-post study designs; and were published from 2000 onward. Outcomes included general characteristics, dynamic models, theory or construct integration, and measured SB and PA behaviors. Data were synthesized narratively. There was limited scope for meta-analysis because of the variability in the study results. Results A total of 1087 publications were screened, with 11 publications describing 8 studies included in the review. All studies targeted PA; 4 also included SB. Social cognitive theory was the major psychological theory upon which the studies were based. Behavioral intervention technology, control systems, computational agent model, exploit-explore strategy, behavioral analytic algorithm, and dynamic decision network were the dynamic models used in the included studies. The effectiveness of quasi-experimental studies involved reduced SB (1 study; P=.08), increased light PA (1 study; P=.002), walking steps (2 studies; P=.06 and P<.001), walking time (1 study; P=.02), moderate-to-vigorous PA (2 studies; P=.08 and P=.81), and nonwalking exercise time (1 study; P=.31). RCT studies showed increased walking steps (1 study; P=.003) and walking time (1 study; P=.06). To measure activity, 5 studies used built-in smartphone sensors (ie, accelerometers), 3 of which used the phone’s GPS, and 3 studies used wearable activity trackers. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to report on smartphone-based studies to reduce SB and promote PA with a focus on integrated dynamic models. These findings highlight the scarcity of dynamic model–based smartphone studies to reduce SB or promote PA. The limited number of studies that incorporate these models shows promising findings. Future research is required to assess the effectiveness of dynamic models in promoting PA and reducing SB. Trial Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020139350; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=139350.

Prediction of cardiac autonomic neuropathy using a machine learning model in patients with diabetes

“…Thus, our model can be applied as a mobile application or online tool, 38 for example, in combination with the National Heart Foundation of Australia heart age calculator which is commonly used by clinicians in general practice (https://www.heartfoundation.org.au/heart-age-calculator). These results might be useful for healthcare providers to predict the early occurrence of CAN in people with diabetes and support them in combination with digital technologies [39][40][41][42] such as wearable devices, 43 smartphone apps 44 and text messages 45,46 which have shown to be cost-effective. 47,48 Furthermore, our study suggests several directions for future work.…”

What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Digital Interventions for Improving Lifestyle? A Scoping Meta-Review

“…The systematic reviews included data ranging from a total of 2 ( 35 ) to 117 ( 36 ) RCTs. Overall, the sample size of the included RCTs ranged between 6 ( 37 ) and 69,219 ( 38 ) participants.…”

Day-of-the-Week and Time-of-the-Day Patterns of Sedentary Behavior in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

“…Findings from the present study suggest that early mornings, evenings, and weekends constitute a significant opportunity for targeting sedentary behavior and underscore their value for optimally timed interventions. Just-in-time intervention methods, which leverage mobile technologies (i.e., mobile apps, activity trackers) to track and then intervene on sedentary behavior at the right time, have increasingly emerged in recent years on the premise that time and event-based recommendations may constitute a more successful intervention approach (39)(40)(41)(42). As the identified time periods (early mornings, evenings, weekends) with more sedentariness conventionally coincides with nonoccupational settings, interventions leveraging these approaches must consider the development of strategies that target the sedentary behaviors (such as TV watching) that tend to occur during these time periods.…”