Smartphone apps for urolithiasis

Abstract

There are an increasing number of healthcare smartphone applications ('apps') available. Urolithiasis presents a major healthcare burden. Patients are increasingly keen to educate themselves regarding the diagnosis and management of their condition. There is no formal regulation of healthcare apps, including a large number of apps relating to urolithiasis. This review aims to examine the range of apps available, and the prevalence of healthcare professional input. Four international smartphone app stores were searched: Apple's App Store, Google Play (Android), BlackBerry App World and the Windows Phone App store. A total of 42 unique apps were downloaded and analysed. Recorded data included the cost (£/$), publisher information, number of ratings, average rating and any documentation of medical professional involvement. Twenty-one (50%) apps required payment for download. The mean cost was £3.58 ($6.04) with range £0.61-£34.90 ($1.03-$58.87). Thirty-three (79%) of the 42 apps were designed to be used by patients. Fifteen (36%) of the 42 apps had clear input from health professionals. Twenty-two apps offered patient information, including dietary advice on lowering calcium intake, which is contrary to current evidence-based practice. We conclude that urolithiasis apps have future potential to inform both patients and healthcare professionals on stone management. However, inaccuracies in the recommendations made by some apps can be misleading or even harmful due to a lack of specialist involvement. We recommend improving the usefulness of these apps by seeking a 'quality stamp' from recognised urological organisations and greater clinician involvement in future app development.

Fighting Melanoma with Smartphones: A Snapshot of Where We are a Decade after App Stores Opened Their Doors

“…This is comparable to Apps in other health areas. For example Apps for urolithiasis or colorectal cancer have health care professional involvement 32% 16 and 36% 17 respectively thus it is reassuring that apps for melanoma are approaching levels of professional involvement seen in other areas. Unfortunately, independent, published peer-review validation of apps remains uncommon.…”

Accuracy of daily fluid intake measurements using a “smart” water bottle

“…In 2013 the U.S US Food and Drug Administration issued final guidance as to their oversight of mobile medical apps announcing that regulatory efforts would be focused on applications serving in an accessory role to registered medical devices or those that transformed the smartphone into a medical device altogether. 11 Considering the myriad of mobile health technologies that do not meet these criteria, it is no surprise that medical professional involvement in this process is relatively low. In the aforementioned study on urolithiasis applications, only one third had any identifiable involvement by health professionals.…”

“…In the aforementioned study on urolithiasis applications, only one third had any identifiable involvement by health professionals. 11 As new and innovative mobile health technologies are introduced we are hopeful that similar efforts are made to test them in a clinical setting as well.…”

“…Results: Eight subjects performed 62 24-hour measurements (range [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Mean hand measurement was 57.2 oz/1692 mL (21-96 oz/621-2839 mL).…”

Medical Applications in Everyday Surgical Practice

“…Additionally, 21% out of the total were designed for doctors and doctors' involvement in those was apparent. [6] When not only kidney stone related urology applications were identified, out of 129 apps the results were also disappointing: 19,4% of the apps were designed without health care personnel involvement. Authors of this review addressed the necessity for regulation by healthcare authorities.…”