2017
DOI: 10.7249/rr1359.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smarter Power, Stronger Partners, Volume II: Trends in Force Projection Against Potential Adversaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhanced language is employed between the 2010 QDR's second priority to "prevent & deter conflict" and the 2011 NMS's second priority to "maintain strategic deterrent capabilities," "maintain a robust conventional deterrent," and "counter anti-access and area denial strategies." 48 Krueger, 2011, p. 3;Mullen, 2011d, p. 8;and Scott Boston, Michael S. Chase, and CVE operations and toward future, near-peer, likely Indo-Pacific conflicts. Ultimately, these considerations would influence the 2012 DSG, which would stress a strategic rebalance of U.S. force posture toward the Indo-Pacific theater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced language is employed between the 2010 QDR's second priority to "prevent & deter conflict" and the 2011 NMS's second priority to "maintain strategic deterrent capabilities," "maintain a robust conventional deterrent," and "counter anti-access and area denial strategies." 48 Krueger, 2011, p. 3;Mullen, 2011d, p. 8;and Scott Boston, Michael S. Chase, and CVE operations and toward future, near-peer, likely Indo-Pacific conflicts. Ultimately, these considerations would influence the 2012 DSG, which would stress a strategic rebalance of U.S. force posture toward the Indo-Pacific theater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%