“Smart Technologies” in Education: Development Opportunities and Threats

Baevа, Liudmila V.; Khrapov, Sergey A.; Azhmukhamedov, Iskhandar M.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59126-7_79

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The main advantages of the modern education system are an integrated approach that includes personalisation (Konobeev et al, 2020), customisation of education (Antonenko et al 2020) and the use of smart technologies (Baeva, Khrapov, and Azhmukhamedov 2021). E-learning based on the MOOC is an innovative and progressive learning approach that has an inevitable impact on student learning (Duan 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of online learning technology on self-regulation and student success

Makhno

Kireeva

Shurygin

2022

Research in Learning Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research purpose is to analyse the self-regulation of students who use the massive open online course (MOOC) technology to learn the exact sciences. The sample included 252 students: females were 47%, and males were 53%. The average age of students was 20.08 ± 0.72. The students were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of students who learnt the Digital singular (nano) optics course online using the MicrosoftTeams platform with teacher’s support; group 2 consisted of students who learnt the MOOC course individually. The relationships between self-regulation and academic success were also analysed. The research found that the overall level of self-regulation of students using MOOCs was 40% higher. In students who learnt online using the MicrosoftTeams, the level of self-regulation was average and amounted to 24.96 ± 1.32. In students who learnt the course based on the MOOC technology, the level of self-regulation was high and amounted to 35.02 ± 1.44 (p < 0.05). The research of self-regulation shows higher results among the students who learnt using MOOCs platforms: flexibility – 46%, planning – 23% and results assessment – 15%; modelling and programming were no different. The average success score of students after learning the course on the MicrosoftTeams platform was 3.83 ± 0.36, and in the MOOC group, it was 4.43 ± 1.89.

show abstract