2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-020-01042-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart Smoke Control as an Efficient Solution for Smoke Ventilation in Converted Cellars of Historic Buildings

Abstract: The paper is focused on the topic of smoke control in a confined, underground cellar area of a historical building, that is undergoing conversion to a restaurant. Similar venues were host to some of the most devastating fires in history. We have investigated the performance of a novel solution, “smart smoke control (SSC)”, and compared its performance with “traditional” smoke venting solution. The investigation was based on CFD simulations performed in a commercial code ANSYS Fluent, modified with user-defined… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the authors' best knowledge, there are no similar CFD studies in the literature where a sensitivity study on the influence of different SEDS parameters has been investigated to this extent. Some numerical studies have modelled the SEDS as a simple vent on a wall without modelling the flow inside the duct (e.g., [3][4][5]) while other studies have considered already existing ducts in buildings without investigating the influence of different SEDS parameters (e.g., [6,7]). In addition, the types of occupancies can also vary significantly ranging from e.g., atria to tunnels, which can pose different requirements with respect to the design of the SEDS when compared to our scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors' best knowledge, there are no similar CFD studies in the literature where a sensitivity study on the influence of different SEDS parameters has been investigated to this extent. Some numerical studies have modelled the SEDS as a simple vent on a wall without modelling the flow inside the duct (e.g., [3][4][5]) while other studies have considered already existing ducts in buildings without investigating the influence of different SEDS parameters (e.g., [6,7]). In addition, the types of occupancies can also vary significantly ranging from e.g., atria to tunnels, which can pose different requirements with respect to the design of the SEDS when compared to our scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panev et al [15] applied machine learning to predict fire resistance of composite shallow floor systems accurately. We ˛grzyn´ski et al [16] devised a novel ''smart smoke control'' (SSC) system for historic buildings. Brown et al [17] leveraged data obtained from wireless sensor networks embedded in fire hoses to enable smart firefighting activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%