2015
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/065004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smart sensing skin for detection and localization of fatigue cracks

Abstract: Fatigue cracks on steel components may have strong consequences on the structure's serviceability and strength. Their detection and localization is a difficult task. Existing technologies enabling structural health monitoring have a complex link signal-to-damage or have economic barriers impeding large-scale deployment. A solution is to develop sensing methods that are inexpensive, scalable, with signals that can directly relate to damage. The authors have recently proposed a smart sensing skin for structural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Crack simulation through the element deletion method: (a) damage evolution model; and (b) simulation of crack growth by deleting elements where each numbered square is an element [18] and Eq. (3) [20] describe the relationships between capacitance change and strain change for uniaxial and biaxial strain fields, respectively, where C0 is the initial capacitance, εx and εy are the two principle strains, ν is the Poisson's ratio of the sensing material with a typical value of 0.49. However, both equations are still difficult to be implemented in the FE analysis, because the strain result in FE analysis is commonly reported as the average strain of the element, while the true strain is difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Crack Growth Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crack simulation through the element deletion method: (a) damage evolution model; and (b) simulation of crack growth by deleting elements where each numbered square is an element [18] and Eq. (3) [20] describe the relationships between capacitance change and strain change for uniaxial and biaxial strain fields, respectively, where C0 is the initial capacitance, εx and εy are the two principle strains, ν is the Poisson's ratio of the sensing material with a typical value of 0.49. However, both equations are still difficult to be implemented in the FE analysis, because the strain result in FE analysis is commonly reported as the average strain of the element, while the true strain is difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Crack Growth Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have reported on the capability of the SEC to detect fatigue crack on small scale steel compact tension (CT) specimens, and also to localize such cracks leveraging a network configuration [20,21,22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust and static characterization of the sensors was demonstrated through testing [47]. Static characterization, dynamic monitoring, localization of fatigue cracks and the distribution of thin film sensor arrays on structures were studied using the referenced SECs [80][81][82][83]. The electrodes of these sensors were composed of SEBS containing carbon black particles, and the sensors were not transparent.…”
Section: Flexible and Large-surface Dielectric Elastomer Sensors Applmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies [15][16][17] indicated that the SEC sensor could accurately measure strain variation of the detected surface by measuring the capacitance change. To investigate the SEC sensor's performance on fatigue crack monitoring, several fatigue tests haven been conducted with compact tension C(T) specimens [18,19]. Test results have shown that the SEC sensor successfully detected crack growth induced by fatigue loading under a constant load range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%