“Smart Is Not Smart Enough!” Anticipating Critical Raw Material Use in Smart City Concepts: The Example of Smart Grids

Abstract

Globally emerging smart city concepts aim to make resource production and allocation in urban areas more efficient, and thus more sustainable through new sociotechnical innovations such as smart grids, smart meters, or solar panels. While recent critiques of smart cities have focused on data security, surveillance, or the influence of corporations on urban development, especially with regard to intelligent communication technologies (ICT), issues related to the material basis of smart city technologies and the interlinked resource problems have largely been ignored in the scholarly literature and in urban planning. Such problems pertain to the provision and recovery of critical raw materials (CRM) from anthropogenic sources like scrap metal repositories, which have been intensely studied during the last few years. To address this gap in the urban planning literature, we link urban planning literatures on smart cities with literatures on CRM mining and recovery from scrap metals. We find that underestimating problems related to resource provision and recovery might lead to management and governance challenges in emerging smart cities, which also entail ethical issues. To illustrate these problems, we refer to the smart city energy domain and explore the smart city-CRM-energy nexus from the perspectives of the respective literatures. We show that CRMs are an important foundation for smart city energy applications such as energy production, energy distribution, and energy allocation. Given current trends in smart city emergence, smart city concepts may potentially foster primary extraction of CRMs, which is linked to considerable environmental and health issues. While the problems associated with primary mining have been well-explored in the literature, we also seek to shed light on the potential substitution and recovery of CRMs from anthropogenic raw material deposits as represented by installed digital smart city infrastructures. Our central finding is that the current smart city literature and contemporary urban planning do not address these issues. This leads to the paradox that smart city concepts are supporting the CRM dependencies that they should actually be seeking to overcome. Discussion on this emerging issue between academics and practitioners has nevertheless not taken place. We address these issues and make recommendations.

Moving towards a Smarter Housing Market: The Example of Poland

“…The first and main element influencing changes in the existing housing market is the smart city concept, which can be defined as the use of digital technology by the city in order to increase the quality and efficiency of services and resources provided [19][20][21]. Furthermore, the implementation of the smart city concept reduces operating costs, leads to an increase in social activity and contributes to sustainable development [22].…”

Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis

“…Additionally, Toppeta [150] examined the infrastructure of smart cities, focusing on aspects related to physics, information technology, society, and business. Eremia et al [151] studied the connection between smart-city and smart-grid [152]. Future smart-city management is still rooted in big data approaches, with sensor network technology as the core.…”

Distributed Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in Virtual Microgrids: A Blockchain Survey for Future Smart Grid

“…SG technologies significantly improve energy demand by involving small networks and distributed energy resources. Existing infrastructure stakeholders are attracted to the rapid growth in electricity use and transparent infrastructure [1]. SGs have also been chosen as powerful self-processing technologies that allow the transfer of electricity and innovation technologies in the same ways.…”