2015
DOI: 10.1080/17509653.2015.1100525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Smart building’ technology network analysis: applying core–periphery structure analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach presents several limitations. First, patents focus on technological solutions (Madani, Daim, and Weng 2017), providing a limited snapshot of possible avenues for value creation. Although it is possible to identify both drawbacks and advantages of technologies or products using patents (Chiarello, Fantoni, and Bonaccorsi 2017), it is highly unlikely to find problems and solutions related to policy and legal issues, consumer interactions, skills and knowledge requirements, or new business models.…”
Section: Problems In Patents and Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this approach presents several limitations. First, patents focus on technological solutions (Madani, Daim, and Weng 2017), providing a limited snapshot of possible avenues for value creation. Although it is possible to identify both drawbacks and advantages of technologies or products using patents (Chiarello, Fantoni, and Bonaccorsi 2017), it is highly unlikely to find problems and solutions related to policy and legal issues, consumer interactions, skills and knowledge requirements, or new business models.…”
Section: Problems In Patents and Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous approaches to this issue have mainly followed two avenues. On the one hand, quantitative patent analyses (Madani, Daim, and Weng 2017) or text-mining in patents (Chiarello, Fantoni, and Bonaccorsi 2017) have been used to map competitor's research agendas, identify core and peripheral patents, and detect unsolved technical limits. On the other hand, literature reviews of scientific papers provide a broader overview of potential problems at a given moment in time, but require skilled personnel, are time-consuming and often lack in reproducibility (Snyder 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published papers have also been specifically used as intelligence units (Garces et al , 2017; Cho and Daim, 2016). Patents have been one of the most preferred intelligence unit in the literature (Pereira et al , 2019; Daim et al , 2020; Li et al , 2019; Lin et al , 2019; Madani et al , 2017, 2018; Daim et al , 2018 and Gibson et al , 2017).…”
Section: Mapping Knowledge To Identify Future Innovation Trajectories: Cases In Emerging Technological Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this contextual backdrop, we develop a near-miss classifier based on a CNN, associate the classified results, and visualize them with a network diagram [ 12 ] and a Sankey diagram so that safety managers can easily find the key points of massive near misses [ 13 ]. First, to structure text data, a CNN-based classifier that incorporates a deep learning method is developed to generate structured classification results of near-miss information within safety records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%