2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-020-01246-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMARCB1/INI1 Deficient Sino-Nasal Carcinoma: Extending the Histomorphological Features

Abstract: SMARCB1/INI1 deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a variant of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC). There is a paucity of literature describing the histomorphological features of this relatively new entity. Herein we describe the histomorphological features of three such cases and review the literature. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of SNUC diagnosed in our institute in the last 6 years. Immunohistochemistry for INI1, NUT & p16 were performed on these cases. Three cases showed loss of INI1. The his… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the remaining 192 patients, 72 patients whose individual baseline patient characteristics, treatment details, and survival outcomes could not be identified and verified [2,16,19,20,23,[28][29][30]34,35,38], and they were thus not included into our survival analysis. As a result, only 120 patients with data availability of baseline patient characteristics, disease stage, and survival outcomes in 25 publications were included for survival and prognostic factor analyses [1,2,11,[13][14][15][16][17]19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][31][32][33]36,37,[39][40][41][42]. Meanwhile, our institution had eight patients who had a complete set of baseline characteristics, treatment details, and survival outcomes, and who were treated between 2014 and 2021.…”
Section: Search Strategy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the remaining 192 patients, 72 patients whose individual baseline patient characteristics, treatment details, and survival outcomes could not be identified and verified [2,16,19,20,23,[28][29][30]34,35,38], and they were thus not included into our survival analysis. As a result, only 120 patients with data availability of baseline patient characteristics, disease stage, and survival outcomes in 25 publications were included for survival and prognostic factor analyses [1,2,11,[13][14][15][16][17]19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][31][32][33]36,37,[39][40][41][42]. Meanwhile, our institution had eight patients who had a complete set of baseline characteristics, treatment details, and survival outcomes, and who were treated between 2014 and 2021.…”
Section: Search Strategy Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that report, Ayyanar et al. argued that as the number of reported cases has increased, the morphological spectrum of this tumor has gradually expanded [ 9 ]. Many different morphological features have been described in the recent literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of SMARCB1 because of biallelic inactivation of its gene in a subset of poorly or undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma has been first described in 2014 by two independent groups, followed by a few additional series including one large multi-institutional series (n=39) [7,8]. To date, <150 cases have been reported [7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Smarcb1-deficient Sinonasal Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, frankly squamous cell features and keratinization are absent. A smaller fraction of cases (30%) displays a "pinkish" eosinophilic, plasmacytoid/ rhabdoid cell morphology [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Scattered plasmacytoid and rhabdoid cells can be identified, also in the basaloid tumors, upon scrutiny [25].…”
Section: Smarcb1-deficient Sinonasal Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%