2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-010-1390-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy

Abstract: In conclusion, our results show that changing loading regimes and evolutionary pressures may have influenced the evolution of bone growth and mechanoregulation, and predict that bone size and strength may continue to decrease in future generations, bringing increased risk of fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results strongly emphasize the importance of physical activity and exercise for bone health and the attenuation of age-related bone loss. trabecular bone | gracilization | human evolution | biomechanics | mobility C ompared with other hominoids and extinct hominin species, more recent humans possess relatively gracile postcranial skeletons (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). One of the consequences of this gracility in contemporary humans is an increased fracture risk associated with age-related bone loss and osteoporosis [hip fractures alone are projected to reach 6.26 million per year globally by 2050 (10)] (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results strongly emphasize the importance of physical activity and exercise for bone health and the attenuation of age-related bone loss. trabecular bone | gracilization | human evolution | biomechanics | mobility C ompared with other hominoids and extinct hominin species, more recent humans possess relatively gracile postcranial skeletons (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). One of the consequences of this gracility in contemporary humans is an increased fracture risk associated with age-related bone loss and osteoporosis [hip fractures alone are projected to reach 6.26 million per year globally by 2050 (10)] (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common explanation is that living populations are simply less physically active compared with extinct hominins or closely related contemporary wild apes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). This hypothesis suggests that a shift in subsistence patterns away from hunting and gathering, combined with an increased reliance on technology, led to reductions in overall physical activity levels and mobility in more recent hominins (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cho et al () determined that there were significant differences in the cortical bone remodeling rates between different ancestry groups. Age, sex, and population differences in the rates and effectiveness of modeling and remodeling could influence bone geometry, and relative cortical area values (Fujita et al, ; Crenshaw et al, ; Högler et al, ; Mays, ; Leonard et al, ; Nowlan et al, ; Nelson et al, ; Ireland et al, ; Jepsen et al, in press; Rantalainen et al, ). The sample used in the present study is skewed towards older individuals of European ancestry, but potential differences in intraskeletal variability over a broader age range and ancestries may exist, and can only be examined with a more representative, larger, and broader sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the results of others (32), women showed 10-11% less Ct.Ar relative to BW-Le compared to men (data not shown) which contributed in part to the functional disparity between sexes. This disparity in tibial stiffness relative to body size may help explain why women sustain approximately 5-times more stress fractures than men during gender-integrated military training regimens (33), and why fracture incidence is greater for elderly women compared to men (34). Prior work by others demonstrated that sex-differences in strength-related morphological parameters are not fully eliminated even after adjusting for body size (32,35).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial regression analyses were conducted to take the effects of age into consideration, showing that A) relative cortical area (RCA = Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar), B) Ct.TMD, C) Ma.BMD, and D) Ct.Th all correlate negatively with robustness. Superior Cortex: R 2 = 0.28, p<0.008 Inferior Cortex: R 2 = 0.04, p<0.34 Superior Cortex: R 2 = 0.28, p<0.008 Inferior Cortex: R 2 = 0.04, p<0.34 Superior Cortex: R 2 = 0.28, p<0.008 Superior Cortex: R 2 = 0.28, p<0.008 Inferior Cortex: R 2 = 0.04, p<0.34 Inferior Cortex: R 2 = 0.04, p<0 34. A validation study confirmed that A) Ct.TMD measured by pQCT correlated significantly with Ct.TMD measured by microCT, B) Ma.BMD measured by pQCT correlated significantly with Tb.TMD measured by microCT, and C) the overall TMD (cortical + trabecular) correlated significantly with ash content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%