“…These include "small-world" behavior, in which the connection structure is more highly clustered (cliquish) compared to randomly wired networks with the same degree distribution, despite a similar overall average path length (distance between all pairs of nodes) (Watts and Strogatz, 1998;Bassett and Bullmore, 2006;Bullmore and Sporns, 2009;Wang et al, 2010a;Hayasaka and Laurienti, 2010). This property has also been observed in many other networks from fields such as genetics, protein folding, metabolism, epidemiology and transport (Watts and Strogatz, 1998;Wagner and Fell, 2001;Vendruscolo et al, 2002;Christley and French, 2003;Sienkiewicz and Hołyst, 2005;Zhang and Horvath, 2005;Braun et al, 2006;Almaas, 2007), and this deviation from the behavior of random NeuroImage 55 (2011NeuroImage 55 ( ) 1132NeuroImage 55 ( -1146 or regular graphs has led to the term "complex network" for such real-world networks. Another property observed in functional connectivity networks is the presence of relatively few, excessively highly-connected, 'hub,' nodes and many more weakly-connected nodes.…”