1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.80.4542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Superconducting Grain in the Canonical Ensemble

Abstract: By means of the Lanczos method we analyze superconducting correlations in ultrasmall grains at fixed particle number. We compute the ground state properties and the excitation gap of the pairing Hamiltonian as a function of the level spacing δ. Both quantities turn out to be parity dependent and universal functions of the ratio δ/∆ (∆ is the BCS gap). We then characterize superconductivity in the canonical ensemble from the scaling behavior of correlation functions in energy space.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
152
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
152
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BCS approach breaks down; (iv) show that the PBCS crossover [35] is qualitatively correct, but not quantitatively, being somewhat too abrupt; (v) are reproduced remarkably well by the approaches of MFF [33] and BH [34]; (vi) are fully reproduced by the DMRG of [36,37] with a relative error of < 10 −4 for n ≤ 400; our figures don't show DMRG curves, since they are indistinghuishable from the exact ones and are discussed in detail in [36,37].…”
Section: Comparison Of Other Canonical Methods With the Exact Solutionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…BCS approach breaks down; (iv) show that the PBCS crossover [35] is qualitatively correct, but not quantitatively, being somewhat too abrupt; (v) are reproduced remarkably well by the approaches of MFF [33] and BH [34]; (vi) are fully reproduced by the DMRG of [36,37] with a relative error of < 10 −4 for n ≤ 400; our figures don't show DMRG curves, since they are indistinghuishable from the exact ones and are discussed in detail in [36,37].…”
Section: Comparison Of Other Canonical Methods With the Exact Solutionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A series of more sophisticated canonical approaches [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] (summarized in Sec. 5.2) confirmed the parity dependence of pairing correlations, but established that the abrupt vanishing of pairing correlations at d BCS p/2 is an artifact of g.c.…”
Section: Superconductivity: Crossover From the Bulk To The Limit Of Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most previous works [2,3,4,6,7,8,9, 10] studied a half-filled band with fixed width 2ω D of uniformly-spaced levels (i.e. ε j = j d), containing N = 2n + b electrons.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…studies [2]- [6], the first canonical study was that of Mastellone, Falci and Fazio (MFF) [7], who used Lanczos exact diagonalization (with n ≤ 12) and a scaling argument to probe the crossover regime.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%