2005
DOI: 10.4064/aa118-1-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small solutions to linear congruences and Hecke equidistribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and hence by (17), Φ 0 (ξ, w, z) equals (6/π 2 ) times the Lebesgue measure of the set of those v ∈ (0, 1) for which the lattice spanned by a 1 = (ξ, z + w) and a 2 = (ξv, v(z + w) + ξ −1 ) (23) has no point in R (z) ξ . Now for any given v ∈ (0, 1) we have ℓa 1 / ∈ R (z) ξ for all ℓ ∈ Z, by considering the first coordinate.…”
Section: (Z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and hence by (17), Φ 0 (ξ, w, z) equals (6/π 2 ) times the Lebesgue measure of the set of those v ∈ (0, 1) for which the lattice spanned by a 1 = (ξ, z + w) and a 2 = (ξv, v(z + w) + ξ −1 ) (23) has no point in R (z) ξ . Now for any given v ∈ (0, 1) we have ℓa 1 / ∈ R (z) ξ for all ℓ ∈ Z, by considering the first coordinate.…”
Section: (Z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We give tail estimates for F 0 .0; / and F 0;0 .0; / for general dimension d in [25]. In the special case d D 2, explicit formulas for F 0 .r; / and F 0;0 .r; / were given in [36], where these limit functions came up in a different set of problems. Specifically, absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure.…”
Section: The Number Of Spheres In a Random Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically we need control on the L 1 -norm of "1 + ε" derivatives of ν; in order to avoid a technical overhead we formulate the bound using a crude interpolation between the Sobolev norms ν W 1,1 and ν W 2,1 (cf., e.g., [48,Sec. 2]).…”
Section: Smoothed Ergodic Averagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now choose ℓ ≥ 1 so that q ℓ−1 ≤ (cX) (44) follows by adding (45), (48) and the bound n>X σ(n)n −2 ≪ ε X ε−1 , replacing ε by 1 3 ε, and using (cX)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%