2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-signal modeling and optimal operating condition of magnetostrictive energy harvester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[268] As shown in Figure 5h, the Stoner-Wohlfarth approximation can describe magneto-mechanical coupling, in which the magnetically coupled material is assumed to be a collection of magnetic domains. For small coaxial stress and magnetic field perturbations, the magneto-mechanical coupling constitutive equation can be expressed as: [269] ΔB = dΔT + 𝜇 H ΔH (23)…”
Section: Magnetostrictive Energy Harvestermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[268] As shown in Figure 5h, the Stoner-Wohlfarth approximation can describe magneto-mechanical coupling, in which the magnetically coupled material is assumed to be a collection of magnetic domains. For small coaxial stress and magnetic field perturbations, the magneto-mechanical coupling constitutive equation can be expressed as: [269] ΔB = dΔT + 𝜇 H ΔH (23)…”
Section: Magnetostrictive Energy Harvestermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 268 ] As shown in Figure 5h, the Stoner–Wohlfarth approximation can describe magneto‐mechanical coupling, in which the magnetically coupled material is assumed to be a collection of magnetic domains. For small coaxial stress and magnetic field perturbations, the magneto‐mechanical coupling constitutive equation can be expressed as: [ 269 ] normalΔBbadbreak=dnormalΔTgoodbreak+μHnormalΔH$$\begin{equation}\Delta B = d\Delta T + {\mu }^{\mathrm{H}}\Delta H\end{equation}$$ normalΔSbadbreak=sHnormalΔTgoodbreak+dnormalΔH$$\begin{equation}\Delta S = {s}^{\mathrm{H}}\Delta T + d\Delta H\end{equation}$$where Δ B , Δ T , Δ H , and Δ S are the magnetic flux density increment, the stress increment, the magnetic field increment, and the strain increment, respectively. d , µ H , and s H are the piezomagnetic constant, the magnetic permeability, and the elastic compliance, respectively.…”
Section: Energy Harvesting Technologies For Microelectronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Ahmed et al, 2020). Those include for instance: Mizukawa et al (2022) described a model of a magnetostrictive energy harvester operating under a small-signal vibration excitation imposed over a constant prestress and magnetic bias using linearized constitutive equations. Palumbo et al (2019) focused on the change of magnetostrictive properties under different mechanical prestresses and magnetic bias, and experimentally investigated the effect of parameter variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, many drawbacks can be associated with the piezoelectric solution, including, in the first line, the absence in the market of large-volume specimens. Also, piezoelectric materials are fragile, exhibit a high output impedance, and can be degraded by aging and fatigue (Anton and Sodano, 2007; Mizukawa et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To effectively harvest the mechanical energy existing in the base excitations, biological motions, and flow waves [ 7 , 8 ], a large variety of vibrational energy harvesters have been proposed based on different mechanisms, e.g., piezoelectric [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], electromagnetic [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], electrostatic [ 20 , 21 ], triboelectric [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], and magnetostriction energy harvesters [ 27 ]. Moreover, two or more mechanisms can also be synergistically combined, which is called a hybrid mechanism [ 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%