2006
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v14n10.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small schools and the pressure to consolidate.

Abstract: Positioned in relationship to reform literature calling for small schools "by design" and interpreting data from a case study of a high performing but low-SES district in a Midwestern state, this paper provides a basis for making sense of the apparent divergence in policies governing schooling structures in rural and urban places.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of studies indicated low enrolment as one of the determinants of size to describe small schools in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Reporting size as a vital predictor of the smallness of schools, studies by the Cotton (1996Cotton ( , 2001, Meier (1998), Howley and Howley (2006), Lee and Smith (1997), Perry (2003), Raywid (1999) and Wasley et al (2000), quoted small as being as low as 250 and as high as 600 to 800 and beyond. Little (2008) pointed out the relative definition of the size of schools when variations in size were observed, from 'very small' with 50 or fewer pupils to small elementary schools in the United States with 300-400 students.…”
Section: Understanding Small Schools: Diversity and Inequitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of studies indicated low enrolment as one of the determinants of size to describe small schools in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Reporting size as a vital predictor of the smallness of schools, studies by the Cotton (1996Cotton ( , 2001, Meier (1998), Howley and Howley (2006), Lee and Smith (1997), Perry (2003), Raywid (1999) and Wasley et al (2000), quoted small as being as low as 250 and as high as 600 to 800 and beyond. Little (2008) pointed out the relative definition of the size of schools when variations in size were observed, from 'very small' with 50 or fewer pupils to small elementary schools in the United States with 300-400 students.…”
Section: Understanding Small Schools: Diversity and Inequitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often grounded on the promise of economies of scale (Howley, Johnson, & Petrie, 2011), consolidation may create opportunities for increased academic and social opportunities (Nitta, Holley, & Wrobel, 2010). Yet mergers can result in larger class sizes, distant student-teacher relationships, increased student transportation time, local resistance, and most salient to this research, a loss of local control over schooling (Blauwkamp, Longo, & Anderson, 2011;Howley & Howley, 2006;Nitta et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is important to note that evidence supports the claims that Concordia Local School District, enrolling 420 students, serves economically disadvantaged students and academic performance in the district's schools remains high (Howley & Howley, 2006). This is an example of a small school that performs well academically, even with students who are economically disadvantaged, has a high level of transience, and a high rate of special education services.…”
Section: Ideal School Sizementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Examining this very issue of school size, Howley and Howley (2006) designed a qualitative study interviewing key personnel in Concordia Local School District. It is important to note that evidence supports the claims that Concordia Local School District, enrolling 420 students, serves economically disadvantaged students and academic performance in the district's schools remains high (Howley & Howley, 2006).…”
Section: Ideal School Sizementioning
confidence: 99%