2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-015-1596-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-Scale Mechanical Testing on Proton Beam-Irradiated 304 SS from Room Temperature to Reactor Operation Temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Characterizing the irradiation evolution of mechanical properties is challenging, however, because ion irradiation produces a near-surface damage layer on the order of a few hundred nm to a few tens of microns. Logically, small-scale mechanical tests have been utilized on ion irradiated materials, including nanoindentation [1][2][3][4][5][6] and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) in situ pillar compression [7] and cantilever bend tests [1]. However, it remains difficult to isolate the mechanical performance of the ion irradiated layer from that of the unirradiated substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing the irradiation evolution of mechanical properties is challenging, however, because ion irradiation produces a near-surface damage layer on the order of a few hundred nm to a few tens of microns. Logically, small-scale mechanical tests have been utilized on ion irradiated materials, including nanoindentation [1][2][3][4][5][6] and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) in situ pillar compression [7] and cantilever bend tests [1]. However, it remains difficult to isolate the mechanical performance of the ion irradiated layer from that of the unirradiated substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pillars fabricated on B2 and L1 2 phases had different orientation and yield strength changes with grain orientation. Therefore, the critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) was calculated for each phase using Schmid factor [41][42][43] to account for the crystal orientation. The slip system with maximum Schmid factor for B2 phase was (121) [11 1] and for L1 2 phase were two, namely (111)[01 1] and (11 1)[011].…”
Section: Small-scale Mechanical Behavior By Nano-indentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the minimum dimension and the obstacle spacing on the glide plane [45]. [66], and cantilever bend tests [40]. However, it remains difficult to isolate the mechanical performance of the ion irradiated layer from that of the unirradiated substrate.…”
Section: Ods Size Effect Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%