2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11063-017-9723-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-Scale Building Load Forecast based on Hybrid Forecast Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recommended approach was compared with various well‐known forecasting models such as the RBFNN, the support vector machine (SVM), the combined wavelet transformed with RBFNN (WT + RBFNN), the persistence model, the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and the combined EMD with RBFNN (EMD + RBFNN). By partial comparison, the same condition was applied in all models through this approach, and the same error criteria were considered as root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), which can be introduced as follows: italicRMSE=1Nfalse∑t=1N()SitalicACT()tSitalicFOR()t21/2, italicMAPE=1Nt=1NSACTtSFORtSACTt×100, italicNMAE=1Nt=1NSACTtSFORtSN×100. …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended approach was compared with various well‐known forecasting models such as the RBFNN, the support vector machine (SVM), the combined wavelet transformed with RBFNN (WT + RBFNN), the persistence model, the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and the combined EMD with RBFNN (EMD + RBFNN). By partial comparison, the same condition was applied in all models through this approach, and the same error criteria were considered as root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), which can be introduced as follows: italicRMSE=1Nfalse∑t=1N()SitalicACT()tSitalicFOR()t21/2, italicMAPE=1Nt=1NSACTtSFORtSACTt×100, italicNMAE=1Nt=1NSACTtSFORtSN×100. …”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multitude researches have investigated the microgrid operation with various [4][5][6] distributed generations (DGs) Optimized coordinated power dispatch approach for a microgrid (MG) scheduling 7 Optimal method with high robustness for MG 8 Stochastic planning scheme for 24 h scheduling for an MG 9 Optimization method for reduction of whole expenditure in an MG 8 Multiobjective optimization methods by assuming expenditure, emission, etc 10,11 Multiobjective optimization for economic dispatch for microgrid with reliability 12 Management method for renewable sources 13 Hybrid-integer nonlinear approach for MG scheduling for achieving upper photovoltaic power 14 Smart power management of microgrid using artificial intelligence methods 15 Cost-effective combined heat and power dispatch with heat/energy reliance features [16][17][18][19] Demand response (DR) problem that can optimize the scheduling using optimization algorithm 20 DR program on stochastic power provided to big users by green resources 21,22 Other models [23][24][25] The considered MO optimization is handled in this work using an epsilon limitation approach. A fuzzy satisfying method is utilized for opting the best conciliation answer, and DRP is exerted to decrease the operation expenditure.…”
Section: Methods Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs are kinds of computing systems that are inspired by biological neural networks. These systems learn activities by examining examples (in other words, they improve their performance in doing activities over time), and generally, this is done without any dedicated programming …”
Section: Tumor Classification Based On Mlp‐cwoa Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems learn activities by examining examples (in other words, they improve their performance in doing activities over time), and generally, this is done without any dedicated programming. [51][52][53][54][55] In the field of mathematical modeling, RBF is an ANN that uses RBFs as activation functions. The output of this network is a linear combination of RBFs for input parameters and neurons.…”
Section: Tumor Classification Based On Mlp-cwoa Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%